本文是OFDM系统的不同QAM调制阶数的误码率与误比特率仿真，仅考虑在高斯白噪声信道下的情景，着重分析不同信噪比下的误码（符号）率性能曲线，不关心具体的调制与解调方案，仿真结果与理论的误码率曲线进行了对比。
考虑一个简单的OFDM系统，每个频域子载波承载一个QAM调制符号，在经过不同信噪比白噪声信道之后，每个QAM调制符号的解调性能如何，每个符号对应的比特解码性能如何？理论的误码性能如何？可以参考如下代码:
clc;close all;clear
%% Seting parameters
EbN0_list = 0:1:10;
Q_order_list = 2:2:10;
loopNumber = 10;
fprintf('Qm\t EbN0 \t \t EsN0 \t \t SNR_Cal \t \t ser \t\t ser_theory\t\t\t ber\t\t nloop \t\t \n');
for iQorder = 1 : length(Q_order_list)
for iEbN0 = 1 : length(EbN0_list)
%% Frame structure
N_Frame = 10;
N_Symbol = 14;
N_RB = 106;
N_SC_perRB = 12;
N_SC = N_RB * N_SC_perRB;
N_Ant = 1;
N_fft_order = floor(log2(N_RB * N_SC_perRB));
N_fft = 2^(N_fft_order+1);
N_cp = N_fft/8;
EbN0 = EbN0_list(iEbN0);
%% Modulation
Q_order = Q_order_list(iQorder);
Qm = 2^Q_order;
N_bit = N_Frame * N_Symbol * N_RB * N_SC_perRB * Q_order;
%% Noise Calculation
SNR = EbN0 + 10 * log10(Q_order);
%% Loop
for iloop = 1 :loopNumber
data_bit_in = randi([0 1], 1, N_bit);
dataSymbolsIn = bi2de(reshape(data_bit_in, Q_order, N_bit/Q_order).', 'left-msb');
dataMod = qammod(dataSymbolsIn, Qm,'UnitAveragePower', true);
%% Show Constellation
%scatterplotme(dataMod)
%% Resource Mapping
RE_Grid = zeros(N_RB * N_SC_perRB,N_Symbol * N_Frame);
dataMod_tmp = reshape(dataMod,N_RB * N_SC_perRB,[]); %only data
Power_Scale = 1;
RE_Grid_all = Power_Scale * dataMod_tmp;
%% IFFT add CP
frame_mod_shift = ifftshift(RE_Grid_all);
ifft_data = ifft(frame_mod_shift,N_fft)*sqrt(N_fft);
%ifft_data = ifft(frame_mod_shift)*sqrt(1272);
Tx_cd = [ifft_data(N_fft-N_cp+1:end,:);ifft_data];
time_signal = reshape(Tx_cd,[],1);
%% Channel
power_RE = sum(sum(abs(RE_Grid_all).^2)) / N_RB / N_SC_perRB / N_Symbol / N_Frame;
power_tp = sum(sum(abs(ifft_data).^2)) / N_RB / N_SC_perRB / N_Symbol / N_Frame; %IFFT zero padding averages the true RE Power
N0 = power_RE .* 10.^(-SNR / 10);
white_noise_starand = 1/sqrt(2)*(randn(size(time_signal)) + 1j * randn(size(time_signal)));
TransmittedSignal = time_signal + sqrt(N0) * white_noise_starand;
%% Receive and Sys
ReceivedSignal = TransmittedSignal;
%% FFT and Frame
frame_recieved_parallel = reshape(ReceivedSignal, N_fft + N_cp, []);
frame_Received = frame_recieved_parallel(N_cp + 1:end,:);
frame_Grid_Received = fft(frame_Received,N_fft) / sqrt(N_fft);
RE_Grid_all_Received = fftshift(frame_Grid_Received(1 : N_SC,:));
%% Demodulation
RE_PreDeMod = reshape(RE_Grid_all_Received,[],1);
dataSymbolsOut = qamdemod(RE_PreDeMod, Qm,'UnitAveragePower', true);
data_bit_out = reshape((de2bi(dataSymbolsOut, 'left-msb')).',1,[]);
power_RE_receid = sum(sum(abs(RE_PreDeMod).^2)) / N_RB / N_SC_perRB / N_Symbol / N_Frame;
snr_all(iQorder,iEbN0,iloop) = 10*log10(power_RE/(power_RE_receid - power_RE));
%% Result: Ser and Ber
%Ser
sym_err = length(find(dataSymbolsOut - dataSymbolsIn));
ser_all(iQorder,iEbN0,iloop) = sym_err / length(dataSymbolsOut);
%Ber
bit_error = sum(abs(data_bit_out - data_bit_in));
ber_all(iQorder,iEbN0,iloop) = bit_error / length(data_bit_out);
end
sers = mean(ser_all,3);
snrs = mean(snr_all,3);
bers = mean(ber_all,3);
sers_theory(iQorder,iEbN0) = QAM_SER_Theory(Qm,EbN0);
fprintf('%dQAM\t%f\t %f\t %f\t %e\t\t%e\t\t%e\t\t%d\t\n', Qm, EbN0, SNR,snrs(iQorder,iEbN0),sers(iQorder,iEbN0),sers_theory(iQorder,iEbN0),bers(iQorder,iEbN0),loopNumber);
end
end
figure(1)
semilogy(EbN0_list, bers(1,:), 'k--+');
hold on
grid on
semilogy(EbN0_list, bers(2,:), 'r--o');
semilogy(EbN0_list, bers(3,:), 'b--x');
semilogy(EbN0_list, bers(4,:), 'g--s');
xlabel('Eb/N0,dB');
ylabel('BER');
title('BER VERS SNR');
legend('QPSK','16QAM','256QAM','1024QAM');
figure(2)
semilogy(EbN0_list, sers(1,:), 'k--+');
hold on
grid on
semilogy(EbN0_list, sers_theory(1,:), 'k-');
semilogy(EbN0_list, sers(2,:), 'r--o');
semilogy(EbN0_list, sers_theory(2,:), 'r-');
semilogy(EbN0_list, sers(3,:), 'b--x');
semilogy(EbN0_list, sers_theory(3,:), 'b-');
semilogy(EbN0_list, sers(4,:), 'g--s');
semilogy(EbN0_list, sers_theory(4,:), 'g-');
xlabel('Eb/N0,dB');
ylabel('SER');
title('SER VERS SNR');
%SML = simulation, THR = theory
legend('QPSK-SML','QPSK-THR','16QAM-SML','16QAM-THR','256QAM-SML','256QAM-THR','1024QAM-SML','1024QAM-THR');
其中用到了一个计算理论误符号率的函数：function SER = QAM_SER_Theory(Qm,EbN0)
%Reference https://dsplog.com/2012/01/01/symbol-error-rate-16qam-64qam-256qam/
Q_order = log2(Qm);
EsN0_DB = EbN0 + 10 * log10(Q_order);
EsN0 = 10.^( EsN0_DB/ 10);
k = sqrt(3 / (2*(Qm - 1)));
k_snr = k * sqrt(EsN0);
cer = erfc(k_snr);
SER = 2*(1 - 1/sqrt(Qm))*cer - (1 - 2/sqrt(Qm) + 1/Qm) * (cer.^2);
% cer = erfc(sqrt(EsN0/2));
% SER = cer - 1/4*cer.^2;
end计算理论误比特率的函数需要参考文献，不过观察误码率与误比特率曲线，感觉只相差一个和常数，或许和调制阶数相关？
如下给出结果：
1:SER VERS SNR（该图理论（THR）误符号率曲线和实际仿真（SML）理论误符号率曲线基本重合）
2:BER VERS SNR（未画出理论误码率曲线）
本仿真中应该重点关注信噪比的换算，包括Eb/N0(每bit的信噪比)到Es/N0(每QAM符号的信噪比)，频域通过IFFT到时域前后计算SNR，特别是子载波个数与IFFT的点数不相同时，如何在时域加噪声，每个时域采样点的噪声功率N0应该加多大。