大模型系列——投机解码:Prompt Lookup Decoding代码解读

官方代码见:GitHub - apoorvumang/prompt-lookup-decoding

UPDATE 2 : This method is now available in vLLM as well by setting speculative_model="[ngram]" 🥳

UPDATE : This has been added to the transformers library. Please see this for a code example, or simply add prompt_lookup_num_tokens=10 to your model.generate(...) call.

TLDR : We modify speculative decoding where we replace the draft model with simple string matching in the prompt to generate candidate token sequences. This results in significant speedups (2x-4x) in input-grounded tasks, with no effect on output quality. This method can be used with any decoder model without model changes or external datastore, and with both greedy and sampling techniques.

Intuition : In several LLM use cases where you're doing input grounded generation (summarization, document QA, multi-turn chat, code editing), there is high n-gram overlap between LLM input (prompt) and LLM output. This could be entity names, phrases, or code chunks that the LLM directly copies from the input while generating the output. Prompt lookup exploits this pattern to speed up autoregressive decoding in LLMs.

python 复制代码
def find_candidate_pred_tokens(input_ids, max_ngram_size=3, num_pred_tokens=10):
    input_length = input_ids.size(1)

    for ngram_size in range(max_ngram_size, 0, -1):
        # Extract the last n tokens as our search ngram
        ngram = input_ids[0, -ngram_size:].tolist()

        # Create sliding windows of size ngram_size
        windows = input_ids.unfold(dimension=1, size=ngram_size, step=1)

        # Convert ngram to a tensor for comparison
        ngram_tensor = torch.tensor(ngram, device=input_ids.device).unsqueeze(0)

        # Find where the windows match the ngram
        matches = (windows == ngram_tensor).all(dim=2)

        # Get the indices of matches
        match_indices = matches.nonzero(as_tuple=True)[1]

        # Iterate through match indices to find a valid continuation
        for idx in match_indices:
            start_idx = idx + ngram_size
            end_idx = start_idx + num_pred_tokens
            # Ensure we don't go beyond the length of input_ids and avoid self-match
            if end_idx <= input_length and start_idx < input_length - ngram_size:
                return input_ids[0, start_idx:end_idx]

    # If no match is found, return an empty tensor
    return torch.tensor([], dtype=torch.long, device=input_ids.device)

ODOs/Thoughts/Future work

  • There's probably better ways to do stringmatching than the current one, and there are several obvious things to improve eg. what to do when there are multiple matches? Whats the ideal length of continuation?
  • We haven't yet tried sampling, although there's no reason it shouldn't work.
    • Here, one additional thing to test would be whether prompt lookup while sampling can affect hallucination rates, since this artifically increases probability of sampling exact sequences from input (this was suggest by my colleague Shwetha S)
  • Testing actual FLOPs impact and tradeoffs is needed
  • Also need to figure out best hyperparams - 3 and 10 were chosen on very little testing
  • It would be an interesting challenge to design the "best lookup function" for decoding, could even be a competition?

这个方法可能还是有问题的,正如坐着所说,可能存在幻觉,不一定ngram匹配上的就能加速

相关推荐
小马92612 小时前
Meta MuseCode:从 Prompt 到持久化 Agent,编码智能体迈入“断点续传“时代
ai·meta·prompt·codingagent·musecode
追风201913 小时前
Prompt、Skill、MCP、Agent 的职责边界:如何判断 AI 能力该放在哪一层
prompt
不瘦80斤不改名2 天前
05-vibe-coding-向agentic-engineering演进
人工智能·笔记·python·prompt
IT小盘2 天前
17-构建Prompt测试集-提示词优化不再凭感觉
服务器·windows·prompt
如此这般英俊2 天前
手搓Claude Code-第十章 system_prompt
数据结构·人工智能·python·语言模型·自然语言处理·prompt
Java成神之路-2 天前
Spring AI 核心探秘:四大 Prompt 角色底层设计与完整闭环实战
人工智能·spring·prompt
'pi%'2 天前
“咒语”质量如何量化?大模型Prompt效果评估与自动化验证方案
运维·自动化·prompt
LayZhangStrive2 天前
claude code使用命令技巧(四)(开发沉淀的提示词模板)
ai·单元测试·prompt·ai编程·提示词·claude code
qq_454245032 天前
SystemPrompt 智能体系统提示词
人工智能·prompt
zzz_23683 天前
AI Coding 的稳定性,不能只靠 Prompt:一次 Harness 工程化拆解
人工智能·prompt