大模型系列——投机解码:Prompt Lookup Decoding代码解读

官方代码见:GitHub - apoorvumang/prompt-lookup-decoding

UPDATE 2 : This method is now available in vLLM as well by setting speculative_model="[ngram]" 🥳

UPDATE : This has been added to the transformers library. Please see this for a code example, or simply add prompt_lookup_num_tokens=10 to your model.generate(...) call.

TLDR : We modify speculative decoding where we replace the draft model with simple string matching in the prompt to generate candidate token sequences. This results in significant speedups (2x-4x) in input-grounded tasks, with no effect on output quality. This method can be used with any decoder model without model changes or external datastore, and with both greedy and sampling techniques.

Intuition : In several LLM use cases where you're doing input grounded generation (summarization, document QA, multi-turn chat, code editing), there is high n-gram overlap between LLM input (prompt) and LLM output. This could be entity names, phrases, or code chunks that the LLM directly copies from the input while generating the output. Prompt lookup exploits this pattern to speed up autoregressive decoding in LLMs.

python 复制代码
def find_candidate_pred_tokens(input_ids, max_ngram_size=3, num_pred_tokens=10):
    input_length = input_ids.size(1)

    for ngram_size in range(max_ngram_size, 0, -1):
        # Extract the last n tokens as our search ngram
        ngram = input_ids[0, -ngram_size:].tolist()

        # Create sliding windows of size ngram_size
        windows = input_ids.unfold(dimension=1, size=ngram_size, step=1)

        # Convert ngram to a tensor for comparison
        ngram_tensor = torch.tensor(ngram, device=input_ids.device).unsqueeze(0)

        # Find where the windows match the ngram
        matches = (windows == ngram_tensor).all(dim=2)

        # Get the indices of matches
        match_indices = matches.nonzero(as_tuple=True)[1]

        # Iterate through match indices to find a valid continuation
        for idx in match_indices:
            start_idx = idx + ngram_size
            end_idx = start_idx + num_pred_tokens
            # Ensure we don't go beyond the length of input_ids and avoid self-match
            if end_idx <= input_length and start_idx < input_length - ngram_size:
                return input_ids[0, start_idx:end_idx]

    # If no match is found, return an empty tensor
    return torch.tensor([], dtype=torch.long, device=input_ids.device)

ODOs/Thoughts/Future work

  • There's probably better ways to do stringmatching than the current one, and there are several obvious things to improve eg. what to do when there are multiple matches? Whats the ideal length of continuation?
  • We haven't yet tried sampling, although there's no reason it shouldn't work.
    • Here, one additional thing to test would be whether prompt lookup while sampling can affect hallucination rates, since this artifically increases probability of sampling exact sequences from input (this was suggest by my colleague Shwetha S)
  • Testing actual FLOPs impact and tradeoffs is needed
  • Also need to figure out best hyperparams - 3 and 10 were chosen on very little testing
  • It would be an interesting challenge to design the "best lookup function" for decoding, could even be a competition?

这个方法可能还是有问题的,正如坐着所说,可能存在幻觉,不一定ngram匹配上的就能加速

相关推荐
在路上走着走着10 天前
Prompt Engineering 入门指南:从原理到上手
人工智能·prompt
coft10 天前
Loop Engineering — 从“写 prompt“到“设计循环“,AI Agent 的下一次进化
人工智能·prompt
CoLiuRs10 天前
从 Prompt 到 Loop:AI 工程到底在卷什么
人工智能·prompt
AI 小老六10 天前
GEPA 架构拆解:让 Prompt 和 Skill 优化不靠玄学
数据库·人工智能·ai·架构·开源·prompt
凯丨10 天前
从写 Prompt 到Loop Engineering:AI 编程的下一次跃迁
prompt
奋飛10 天前
从 Prompt 到 Agent:LangChain 究竟解决了什么问题
ai·langchain·prompt·agent
沪漂阿龙11 天前
Context Engineering:比 Prompt Engineering 更重要的上下文工程
人工智能·langchain·prompt
猿人谷11 天前
从 Prompt Engineering 到 Loop Engineering:AI 编程正在进入“闭环工程”时代
大数据·人工智能·prompt
取个鸣字真的难11 天前
Image2 生成 PPT 的最后分水岭:Prompt
人工智能·prompt·powerpoint
啾啾Fun11 天前
【LLM 应用优化】Prompt Caching:LLM 调用成本降 90% 的底层机制与实战策略
缓存·prompt