本文主要介绍PG的各个状态，以及ceph故障过程中PG状态的转变。

Placement Group States（PG状态）

creating

Ceph is still creating the placement group.

Ceph 仍在创建PG。

activating

The placement group is peered but not yet active.

PG已经互联，但是还没有active。

active

Ceph will process requests to the placement group.

Ceph 可处理到此PG的请求。

clean

Ceph replicated all objects in the placement group the correct

number of times.

PG内所有的对象都被正确的复制了对应的份数。

down

A replica with necessary data is down, so the placement group is

offline.

一个包含必备数据的副本离线，所以PG也离线了。

scrubbing

Ceph is checking the placement group metadata for inconsistencies.

Ceph 正在检查PG metadata的一致性。

deep

Ceph is checking the placement group data against stored checksums.

Ceph 正在检查PG数据和checksums的一致性。

degraded

Ceph has not replicated some objects in the placement group the

correct number of times yet.

PG中的一些对象还没有被复制到规定的份数。

inconsistent

Ceph detects inconsistencies in the one or more replicas of an

object in the placement group (e.g. objects are the wrong size,

objects are missing from one replica *after* recovery finished,

etc.).

Ceph检测到PG中对象的一份或多份数据不一致（比如对象大小不一致，或者恢复成功后对象丢失）

peering

The placement group is undergoing the peering process

PG正在互联过程中。

repair

Ceph is checking the placement group and repairing any

inconsistencies it finds (if possible).

Ceph正在检查PG并且修复所有发现的不一致情况（如果有的话）。

recovering

Ceph is migrating/synchronizing objects and their replicas.

Ceph正在迁移/同步对象和其副本。

forced_recovery

High recovery priority of that PG is enforced by user.

用户指定的PG高优先级恢复

recovery_wait

The placement group is waiting in line to start recover.

PG正在等待恢复被调度执行。

recovery_toofull

A recovery operation is waiting because the destination OSD is over

its full ratio.

恢复操作因为目标OSD容量超过指标而挂起。

recovery_unfound

Recovery stopped due to unfound objects.

恢复因为没有找到对应对象而停止。

backfilling

Ceph is scanning and synchronizing the entire contents of a

placement group instead of inferring what contents need to be

synchronized from the logs of recent operations. Backfill is a

special case of recovery.

Ceph正常扫描并同步整个PG的数据，而不是从最近的操作日志中推断需要同步的数据，Backfill（回填）是恢复的一个特殊状态。

forced_backfill

High backfill priority of that PG is enforced by user.

用户指定的高优先级backfill。

backfill_wait

The placement group is waiting in line to start backfill.

PG正在等待backfill被调度执行。

backfill_toofull

A backfill operation is waiting because the destination OSD is over

its full ratio.

backfill操作因为目标OSD容量超过指标而挂起。

backfill_unfound

Backfill stopped due to unfound objects.

Backfill因为没有找到对应对象而停止。

incomplete

Ceph detects that a placement group is missing information about

writes that may have occurred, or does not have any healthy copies.

If you see this state, try to start any failed OSDs that may contain

the needed information. In the case of an erasure coded pool

temporarily reducing min\_size may allow recovery.

Ceph 探测到某一PG可能丢失了写入信息，或者没有健康的副本。如果你看到了这个状态，尝试启动有可能包含所需信息的失败OSD，

如果是erasure coded pool的话，临时调整一下`min_size`也可能完成恢复。

stale

The placement group is in an unknown state - the monitors have not

received an update for it since the placement group mapping changed.

PG状态未知，从PG mapping更新后Monitor一直没有收到更新。

remapped

The placement group is temporarily mapped to a different set of OSDs

from what CRUSH specified.

PG被临时分配到了和CRUSH所指定的不同的OSD上。

undersized

The placement group has fewer copies than the configured pool

replication level.

该PG的副本数量小于存储池所配置的副本数量。

peered

The placement group has peered, but cannot serve client IO due to

not having enough copies to reach the pool\'s configured min\_size

parameter. Recovery may occur in this state, so the pg may heal up

to min\_size eventually.

PG已互联，但是不能向客户端提供服务，因为其副本数没达到本存储池的配置值（ min_size 参数）。

在此状态下恢复会进行，所以此PG最终能达到 min_size 。

snaptrim

Trimming snaps.

正在对快照做Trim操作。

snaptrim_Wait

Queued to trim snaps.

Trim操作等待被调度执行

snaptrim_Error

Error stopped trimming snaps.

Trim操作因为错误而停止

Placement Group Concepts（PG相关概念）

Peering (建立互联)

The process of bringing all of the OSDs that store a Placement Group

(PG) into agreement about the state of all of the objects (and their

metadata) in that PG. Note that agreeing on the state does not mean

that they all have the latest contents.

表示所有存储PG数据的OSD达成对PG中所有对象（和元数据）共识的过程。

需要注意的是达成共识并不代表他们都拥有最新的数据。

Acting Set (在任集合)

The ordered list of OSDs who are (or were as of some epoch)

responsible for a particular placement group.

一个OSD的有序集合，他们为一个PG（或者一些版本）负责。

Up Set (当选集合)

一列有序OSD ，它们依据 CRUSH 算法为某一PG的特定元版本负责。

它通常和*Acting Set*相同，除非*Acting Set*被OSD map中的`pg_temp`显式地覆盖了。

a.acting set & up set：每个pg都有这两个集合，acting set中保存是该pg所有的副本所在OSD的集合，比如acting[0,1,2]，就表示这个pg的副本保存在OSD.0 、OSD.1、OSD.2中，而且排在第一位的是OSD.0 ，表示这个OSD.0是PG的primary副本。在通常情况下 up set 与 acting set是相同的。区别不同之处需要先了解pg_temp。

b.pg_temp : 假设当一个PG的副本数量不够时，这时的副本情况为acting/up = [1,2]/[1,2]。这时添加一个OSD.3作为PG的副本。经过crush的计算发现，这个OSD.3应该为当前PG的primary，但是呢，这OSD.3上面还没有PG的数据，所以无法承担primary，所以需要申请一个pg_temp，这个pg_temp就还采用OSD.1作为primary，此时pg的集合为acting，pg_temp的集合为up。当然pg与pg_temp是不一样的，所以这时pg的集合变成了acting/up = [3,1,2]/[1,2,3]。当OSD.3上的数据全部都恢复完成后，就变成了[3,1,2]/[3,1,2]。

** acting set为某一特定PG所映射的OSD；up set是当前PG处理客户端请求时所映射的一组OSD。**在大多数情况下acting set与up set是一致的，如果不同则说明ceph在迁移数据或OSD在恢复，也可能此时ceph集群出现了其他未知故障。

Current Interval or Past Interval

A sequence of OSD map epochs during which the *Acting Set* and *Up

Set* for particular placement group do not change.

某一PG所在*Acting Set*和*Up Set*未更改时的一系列OSD map元版本。

Primary (主 OSD)

The member (and by convention first) of the *Acting Set*, that is

responsible for coordination peering, and is the only OSD that will

accept client-initiated writes to objects in a placement group.

*Acting Set*的成员（按惯例为第一个），它负责协调互联，并且是PG内惟一接受客户端初始写入的OSD。

Replica (副本 OSD)

A non-primary OSD in the *Acting Set* for a placement group (and who

has been recognized as such and *activated* by the primary).

PG的*Acting Set*内不是主OSD的其它OSD ，它们被同等对待、由主OSD激活。

Stray (彷徨 OSD)

An OSD that is not a member of the current *Acting Set*, but has not

yet been told that it can delete its copies of a particular

placement group.

不在PG的当前*Acting Set*中，但是还没有被告知要删除其副本的OSD。

Recovery (恢复)

Ensuring that copies of all of the objects in a placement group are

on all of the OSDs in the *Acting Set*. Once *Peering* has been

performed, the *Primary* can start accepting write operations, and

*Recovery* can proceed in the background.

确保*Acting Set*内、PG中的所有对象的副本都存在于所有OSD上。

一旦互联完成，主OSD就以接受写操作，且恢复进程可在后台进行。

PG Info (PG 信息)

Basic metadata about the placement group\'s creation epoch, the

version for the most recent write to the placement group, *last

epoch started*, *last epoch clean*, and the beginning of the

*current interval*. Any inter-OSD communication about placement

groups includes the *PG Info*, such that any OSD that knows a

placement group exists (or once existed) also has a lower bound on

*last epoch clean* or *last epoch started*.

基本元数据，关于PG创建元版本、PG的最新写版本、最近的开始元版本（last epoch started）、

最近的干净元版本（last epoch clean）、和当前间隔（current interval）的起点。

OSD间关于PG的任何通讯都包含PG Info，这样任何知道PG存在（或曾经存在）的OSD也必定有last epoch clean或last epoch started的下限。

PG Log (PG 日志)

A list of recent updates made to objects in a placement group. Note

that these logs can be truncated after all OSDs in the *Acting Set*

have acknowledged up to a certain point.

PG内对象的一系列最近更新。需要注意的是这些日志在*Acting Set*内的所有OSD确认更新到某点后可以删除。

Missing Set (缺失集合)

Each OSD notes update log entries and if they imply updates to the

contents of an object, adds that object to a list of needed updates.

This list is called the *Missing Set* for that `<OSD,PG>`.

每个OSD都会记录更新日志，而且如果它们包含对象内容的更新，

会把那个对象加入一个待更新列表，这个列表叫做那个`<OSD,PG>`的*Missing Set*。

Authoritative History (权威历史)

A complete, and fully ordered set of operations that, if performed,

would bring an OSD\'s copy of a placement group up to date.

一个完整、完全有序的操作集合，如果再次执行，可把一个OSD上的PG副本还原到最新。

Epoch (元版本)

A (monotonically increasing) OSD map version number

一个（单调递增的）OSD map版本号。

Last Epoch Start (最新起始元版本)

The last epoch at which all nodes in the *Acting Set* for a

particular placement group agreed on an *Authoritative History*. At

this point, *Peering* is deemed to have been successful.

最新元版本，在这点上，PG所对应*Acting Set*内的所有节点都对权威历史达成了一致、

并且互联被认为成功了。

up_thru (领导拍板)

Before a *Primary* can successfully complete the *Peering* process,

it must inform a monitor that is alive through the current OSD map

*Epoch* by having the monitor set its *up\_thru* in the osd map.

This helps *Peering* ignore previous *Acting Sets* for which

*Peering* never completed after certain sequences of failures, such

as the second interval below:

*acting set* = \[A,B\]
*acting set* = \[A\]
*acting set* = \[\] very shortly after (e.g., simultaneous

failure, but staggered detection)

*acting set* = \[B\] (B restarts, A does not)

主OSD要想成功完成互联，它必须通过当前OSD map元版本通知一个Monitor，让此Monitor在OSD map中设置其up_thru。

这会使互联进程忽略之前的*Acting Set*，因为它经历特定顺序的失败后一直不能互联，比如像下面的第二周期：

acting set = [A,B]

acting set = [A]

acting set = [] 之后很短时间（例如同时失败、但探测是交叉的）

acting set = [B] （ B 重启了、但 A 没有）

Last Epoch Clean (最新干净元版本)

The last *Epoch* at which all nodes in the *Acting set* for a

particular placement group were completely up to date (both

placement group logs and object contents). At this point, *recovery*

is deemed to have been completed.

最近的Epoch，这时某一特定PG所在*Acting Set*内的所有节点都全部更新了（包括PG日志和对象内容）。

在这点上，恢复被认为已完成。

3.故障模拟

3.1 undersized+degraded状态

a.停止osd.1

登录后复制

systemctl stop ceph-osd@1

```

* b.查看PG状态

```

ceph pg stat

20 pgs: 20 active+undersized+degraded; 14512 kB data, 302 GB used, 6388 GB / 6691 GB avail; 12/36 objects degraded (33.333%)

```

* c.查看集群监控状态

```

ceph health detail

HEALTH_WARN 1 osds down; Degraded data redundancy: 12/36 objects degraded (33.333%), 20 pgs unclean, 20 pgs degraded; application not enabled on 1 pool(s)

OSD_DOWN 1 osds down

osd.1 (root=default,host=ceph-xx-cc00) is down

PG_DEGRADED Degraded data redundancy: 12/36 objects degraded (33.333%), 20 pgs unclean, 20 pgs degraded

pg 1.0 is active+undersized+degraded, acting [0,2]

pg 1.1 is active+undersized+degraded, acting [2,0]

```

* d.客户端IO操作

```

#写入对象

// 把ceph.conf文件存放在test_pool中，对象名字为myobject。

$ bin/rados -p test_pool put myobject ceph.conf

#读取对象到文件

$ bin/rados -p test_pool get myobject myobject.old

#查看文件

$ ll ceph.conf*

-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 6211 Jun 25 14:01 ceph.conf

-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 6211 Jul 3 19:57 ceph.conf.old

```

* e.故障总结：

为了模拟故障，(size = 3, min_size = 2) 我们手动停止了 osd.1，然后查看PG状态，可见，它此刻的状态是active+undersized+degraded,当一个 PG 所在的 OSD 挂掉之后，这个 PG 就会进入undersized+degraded 状态，而后面的[0,2]的意义就是还有两个副本存活在 osd.0 和 osd.2 上, 并且这个时候客户端可以正常读写IO。

**3.2 Peered状态**

Peering已经完成，但是PG当前Acting Set规模小于存储池规定的最小副本数(min_size)。

* a.停掉两个副本osd.1,osd.0

```

$ systemctl stop ceph-osd@1

$ systemctl stop ceph-osd@0

```

* b.查看集群健康状态

```

$ bin/ceph health detail

HEALTH_WARN 1 osds down; Reduced data availability: 4 pgs inactive; Degraded data redundancy: 26/39 objects degraded (66.667%), 20 pgs unclean, 20 pgs degraded; application not enabled on 1 pool(s)

OSD_DOWN 1 osds down

osd.0 (root=default,host=ceph-xx-cc00) is down

PG_AVAILABILITY Reduced data availability: 4 pgs inactive

pg 1.6 is stuck inactive for 516.741081, current state undersized+degraded+peered, last acting [2]

pg 1.10 is stuck inactive for 516.737888, current state undersized+degraded+peered, last acting [2]

pg 1.11 is stuck inactive for 516.737408, current state undersized+degraded+peered, last acting [2]

pg 1.12 is stuck inactive for 516.736955, current state undersized+degraded+peered, last acting [2]

PG_DEGRADED Degraded data redundancy: 26/39 objects degraded (66.667%), 20 pgs unclean, 20 pgs degraded

pg 1.0 is undersized+degraded+peered, acting [2]

pg 1.1 is undersized+degraded+peered, acting [2]

```

* c.客户端IO操作(夯住)

```

#读取对象到文件，夯住IO

$ bin/rados -p test_pool get myobject ceph.conf.old

```

* d.故障总结：

```

现在pg 只剩下osd.2上存活，并且 pg 还多了一个状态：peered，英文的意思是仔细看，这里我们可以理解成协商、搜索。

这时候读取文件，会发现指令会卡在那个地方一直不动，为什么就不能读取内容了，因为我们设置的 min_size=2 ，如果存活数少于2，比如这里的 1 ，那么就不会响应外部的IO请求。

```

* e.调整min_size=1可以解决IO夯住问题

```

#设置min_size = 1

$ bin/ceph osd pool set test_pool min_size 1

set pool 1 min_size to 1

```

* f.查看集群监控状态

```

$ bin/ceph health detail

HEALTH_WARN 1 osds down; Degraded data redundancy: 26/39 objects degraded (66.667%), 20 pgs unclean, 20 pgs degraded, 20 pgs undersized; application not enabled on 1 pool(s)

OSD_DOWN 1 osds down

osd.0 (root=default,host=ceph-xx-cc00) is down

PG_DEGRADED Degraded data redundancy: 26/39 objects degraded (66.667%), 20 pgs unclean, 20 pgs degraded, 20 pgs undersized

pg 1.0 is stuck undersized for 65.958983, current state active+undersized+degraded, last acting [2]

pg 1.1 is stuck undersized for 65.960092, current state active+undersized+degraded, last acting [2]

pg 1.2 is stuck undersized for 65.960974, current state active+undersized+degraded, last acting [2]

```

* g.客户端IO操作

```

#读取对象到文件中

$ ll -lh ceph.conf*

-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 6.1K Jun 25 14:01 ceph.conf

-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 6.1K Jul 3 20:11 ceph.conf.old

-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 6.1K Jul 3 20:11 ceph.conf.old.1

```

* h.故障总结：

```

可以看到，PG状态Peered没有了，并且客户端文件IO可以正常读写了。

当min_size=1时，只要集群里面有一份副本活着，那就可以响应外部的IO请求。

```

> Peered状态我们这里可以将它理解成它在等待其他副本上线。

当min_size = 2 时，也就是必须保证有两个副本存活的时候就可以去除Peered这个状态。

处于 Peered 状态的 PG 是不能响应外部的请求的并且IO被挂起。

**3.3 Remapped状态**

Peering完成，PG当前Acting Set与Up Set不一致就会出现Remapped状态。

* a. 停止osd.x

```

systemctl stop ceph-osd@x

```

* b. 间隔5分钟，启动osd.x

```

systemctl start ceph-osd@x

```

* c. 查看PG状态

```

$ ceph pg stat

1416 pgs: 6 active+clean+remapped, 1288 active+clean, 3 stale+active+clean, 119 active+undersized+degraded; 74940 MB data, 250 GB used, 185 TB / 185 TB avail; 1292/48152 objects degraded (2.683%)

$ ceph pg dump | grep remapped

dumped all

13.cd 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 active+clean+remapped 2018-07-03 20:26:14.478665 9453'2 20716:11343 [10,23] 10 [10,23,14] 10 9453'2 2018-07-03 20:26:14.478597 9453'2 2018-07-01 13:11:43.262605

3.1a 44 0 0 0 0 373293056 1500 1500 active+clean+remapped 2018-07-03 20:25:47.885366 20272'79063 20716:109173 [9,23] 9 [9,23,12] 9 20272'79063 2018-07-03 03:14:23.960537 20272'79063 2018-07-03 03:14:23.960537

5.f 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 active+clean+remapped 2018-07-03 20:25:47.888430 0'0 20716:15530 [23,8] 23 [23,8,22] 23 0'0 2018-07-03 06:44:05.232179 0'0 2018-06-30 22:27:16.778466

3.4a 45 0 0 0 0 390070272 1500 1500 active+clean+remapped 2018-07-03 20:25:47.886669 20272'78385 20716:108086 [7,23] 7 [7,23,17] 7 20272'78385 2018-07-03 13:49:08.190133 7998'78363 2018-06-28 10:30:38.201993

13.102 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 active+clean+remapped 2018-07-03 20:25:47.884983 9453'5 20716:11334 [1,23] 1 [1,23,14] 1 9453'5 2018-07-02 21:10:42.028288 9453'5 2018-07-02 21:10:42.028288

13.11d 1 0 0 0 0 4194304 1539 1539 active+clean+remapped 2018-07-03 20:25:47.886535 20343'22439 20716:86294 [4,23] 4 [4,23,15] 4 20343'22439 2018-07-03 17:21:18.567771 20343'22439 2018-07-03 17:21:18.567771#2分钟之后查询$ ceph pg stat

1416 pgs: 2 active+undersized+degraded+remapped+backfilling, 10 active+undersized+degraded+remapped+backfill_wait, 1401 active+clean, 3 stale+active+clean; 74940 MB data, 247 GB used, 179 TB / 179 TB avail; 260/48152 objects degraded (0.540%); 49665 kB/s, 9 objects/s recovering$ ceph pg dump | grep remapped

dumped all

13.1e8 2 0 2 0 0 8388608 1527 1527 active+undersized+degraded+remapped+backfill_wait 2018-07-03 20:30:13.999637 9493'38727 20754:165663 [18,33,10] 18 [18,10] 18 9493'38727 2018-07-03 19:53:43.462188 0'0 2018-06-28 20:09:36.303126$ ceph pg stat

1416 pgs: 6 active+clean+remapped, 1288 active+clean, 3 stale+active+clean, 119 active+undersized+degraded; 74940 MB data, 250 GB used, 185 TB / 185 TB avail; 1292/48152 objects degraded (2.683%)

$ ceph pg dump | grep remapped

dumped all

13.cd 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 active+clean+remapped 2018-07-03 20:26:14.478665 9453'2 20716:11343 [10,23] 10 [10,23,14] 10 9453'2 2018-07-03 20:26:14.478597 9453'2 2018-07-01 13:11:43.262605

5.f 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 active+clean+remapped 2018-07-03 20:25:47.888430 0'0 20716:15530 [23,8] 23 [23,8,22] 23 0'0 2018-07-03 06:44:05.232179 0'0 2018-06-30 22:27:16.778466

13.102 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 active+clean+remapped 2018-07-03 20:25:47.884983 9453'5 20716:11334 [1,23] 1 [1,23,14] 1 9453'5 2018-07-02 21:10:42.028288 9453'5 2018-07-02 21:10:42.028288

dumped all

```

* d. 客户端IO操作

```

#rados读写正常

rados -p test_pool put myobject /tmp/test.log

```

* e. 故障总结：

```

1.在 OSD 挂掉或者在扩容的时候PG 上的OSD会按照Crush算法重新分配PG 所属的osd编号。并且会把 PG Remap到别的OSD上去。

2.Remapped状态时，PG当前Acting Set与Up Set不一致。

3.客户端IO可以正常读写。

```

****

**4.Recovery状态**

指PG通过PGLog日志针对数据不一致的对象进行同步和修复的过程。

a. 停止osd.x

```

systemctl stop ceph-osd@x

```

b. 间隔1分钟启动osd.x

```

systemctl start ceph-osd@x

```

c. 查看集群监控状态

```

$ ceph health detail

HEALTH_WARN Degraded data redundancy: 183/57960 objects degraded (0.316%), 17 pgs unclean, 17 pgs degraded

PG_DEGRADED Degraded data redundancy: 183/57960 objects degraded (0.316%), 17 pgs unclean, 17 pgs degraded

pg 1.19 is active+recovery_wait+degraded, acting [29,9,17]

```

d. 故障总结：

```

Recovery是通过记录的PGLog进行恢复数据的。

记录的PGLog 在osd_max_pg_log_entries=10000条以内，这个时候通过PGLog就能增量恢复数据。

```

**5.Backfill状态**

当PG的副本无非通过PGLog来恢复数据，这个时候就需要进行全量同步，通过完全拷贝当前Primary所有对象的方式进行全量同步。

* a. 停止osd.x

```

systemctl stop ceph-osd@x

```

* b. 间隔10分钟启动osd.x

```

systemctl start ceph-osd@x

```

* c. 查看集群健康状态

```

$ ceph health detail

HEALTH_WARN Degraded data redundancy: 6/57927 objects degraded (0.010%), 1 pg unclean, 1 pg degraded

PG_DEGRADED Degraded data redundancy: 6/57927 objects degraded (0.010%), 1 pg unclean, 1 pg degraded

pg 3.7f is active+undersized+degraded+remapped+backfilling, acting [21,29]

```

* d. 故障总结：

```

1.无法根据记录的PGLog进行恢复数据时，就需要执行Backfill过程全量恢复数据。

2.如果超过osd_max_pg_log_entries=10000条，这个时候需要全量恢复数据。

```

**6.Stale状态**

* mon检测到当前PG的Primary所在的osd宕机。

* Primary超时未向mon上报pg相关的信息(例如网络阻塞)。

* PG内三个副本都挂掉的情况。

a. 分别停止PG中的三个副本osd, 首先停止osd.23

```

systemctl stop ceph-osd@23

```

b. 然后停止osd.24

```

systemctl stop ceph-osd@24

```

c. 查看停止两个副本PG 1.45的状态(undersized+degraded+peered)

```

$ ceph health detail

HEALTH_WARN 2 osds down; Reduced data availability: 9 pgs inactive; Degraded data redundancy: 3041/47574 objects degraded (6.392%), 149 pgs unclean, 149 pgs degraded, 149 pgs undersized

OSD_DOWN 2 osds down

osd.23 (root=default,host=ceph-xx-osd02) is down

osd.24 (root=default,host=ceph-xx-osd03) is down

PG_AVAILABILITY Reduced data availability: 9 pgs inactive

pg 1.45 is stuck inactive for 281.355588, current state undersized+degraded+peered, last acting [10]

```

d. 在停止PG 1.45中第三个副本osd.10

```

systemctl stop ceph-osd@10

```

e. 查看停止三个副本PG 1.45的状态(stale+undersized+degraded+peered)

```

ceph health detail

HEALTH_WARN 3 osds down; Reduced data availability: 26 pgs inactive, 2 pgs stale; Degraded data redundancy: 4770/47574 objects degraded (10.026%), 222 pgs unclean, 222 pgs degraded, 222 pgs undersized

OSD_DOWN 3 osds down

osd.10 (root=default,host=ceph-xx-osd01) is down

osd.23 (root=default,host=ceph-xx-osd02) is down

osd.24 (root=default,host=ceph-xx-osd03) is down

PG_AVAILABILITY Reduced data availability: 26 pgs inactive, 2 pgs stale

pg 1.9 is stuck inactive for 171.200290, current state undersized+degraded+peered, last acting [13]

pg 1.45 is stuck stale for 171.206909, current state stale+undersized+degraded+peered, last acting [10]

pg 1.89 is stuck inactive for 435.573694, current state undersized+degraded+peered, last acting [32]

pg 1.119 is stuck inactive for 435.574626, current state undersized+degraded+peered, last acting [28]

```

f. 客户端IO操作

```

#读写挂载磁盘IO 夯住

ll /mnt/

```

g. 故障总结：

```

先停止同一个PG内两个副本，状态是undersized+degraded+peered。

然后停止同一个PG内第三个副本，状态是stale+undersized+degraded+peered。

1.当出现一个PG内三个副本都挂掉的情况，就会出现stale状态。

2.此时该PG不能提供客户端读写，IO挂起夯住。

3.Primary超时未向mon上报pg相关的信息(例如网络阻塞),也会出现stale状态。

```

**7.Inconsistent状态**

PG通过Scrub检测到某个或者某些对象在PG实例间出现了不一致

* a. 删除PG 3.0中副本osd.34头文件

```

rm -rf /var/lib/ceph/osd/ceph-34/current/3.0_head/DIR_0/1000000697c.0000122c__head_19785300__3

```

* b. 手动执行PG 3.0进行数据清洗

```

$ ceph pg scrub 3.0

instructing pg 3.0 on osd.34 to scrub

```

* c. 检查集群监控状态

```

$ ceph health detail

HEALTH_ERR 1 scrub errors; Possible data damage: 1 pg inconsistent

OSD_SCRUB_ERRORS 1 scrub errors

PG_DAMAGED Possible data damage: 1 pg inconsistent

pg 3.0 is active+clean+inconsistent, acting [34,23,1]

```

* d. 修复PG 3.0

```

$ ceph pg repair 3.0

instructing pg 3.0 on osd.34 to repair

#查看集群监控状态

$ ceph health detail

HEALTH_ERR 1 scrub errors; Possible data damage: 1 pg inconsistent, 1 pg repair

OSD_SCRUB_ERRORS 1 scrub errors

PG_DAMAGED Possible data damage: 1 pg inconsistent, 1 pg repair

pg 3.0 is active+clean+scrubbing+deep+inconsistent+repair, acting [34,23,1]

#集群监控状态已恢复正常

$ ceph health detail

HEALTH_OK

```

* e. 故障总结：

```

当PG内部三个副本有数据不一致的情况，想要修复不一致的数据文件，只需要执行ceph pg repair修复指令，ceph就会从其他的副本中将丢失的文件拷贝过来就行修复数据。

当osd短暂挂掉的时候，因为集群内还存在着两个副本，是可以正常写入的，但是 osd.34 内的数据并没有得到更新，过了一会osd.34上线了，这个时候osd.34的数据是陈旧的，就通过其他的OSD 向 osd.34 进行数据的恢复，使其数据为最新的，而这个恢复的过程中，PG的状态会从inconsistent ->recover -> clean,最终恢复正常。

这是集群故障自愈一种场景。

```

**8.PG down状态**

PG为Down的场景是由于osd节点数据太旧，并且其他在线的osd不足以完成数据修复。

这个时候该PG不能提供客户端IO读写。

* a. 查看PG 3.7f内副本数

```

$ ceph pg dump | grep ^3.7f

dumped all

3.7f 43 0 0 0 0 494927872 1569 1569 active+clean 2018-07-05 02:52:51.512598 21315'80115 21356:111666 [5,21,29] 5 [5,21,29] 5 21315'80115 2018-07-05 02:52:51.512568 6206'80083 2018-06-29 22:51:05.831219

```

* b. 停止PG 3.7f 副本osd.21

```

systemctl stop ceph-osd@21

```

* c. 查看PG 3.7f状态

```

$ ceph pg dump | grep ^3.7f

dumped all

3.7f 66 0 89 0 0 591396864 1615 1615 active+undersized+degraded 2018-07-05 15:29:15.741318 21361'80161 21365:128307 [5,29] 5 [5,29] 5 21315'80115 2018-07-05 02:52:51.512568 6206'80083 2018-06-29 22:51:05.831219

```

* d. 客户端写入数据，一定要确保数据写入到PG 3.7f的副本中[5,29]

```

fio 写入数据

```

* e. 停止PG 3.7f中副本osd.29,并且查看PG 3.7f状态(undersized+degraded+peered)

```

#停止该PG副本osd.29

systemctl stop ceph-osd@29

#查看该PG 3.7f状态为undersized+degraded+peered

ceph pg dump | grep ^3.7f

dumped all

3.7f 70 0 140 0 0 608174080 1623 1623 undersized+degraded+peered 2018-07-05 15:35:51.629636 21365'80169 21367:132165 [5] 5 [5] 5 21315'80115 2018-07-05 02:52:51.512568 6206'80083 2018-06-29 22:51:05.831219

```

* f. 停止PG 3.7f中副本osd.5,并且查看PG 3.7f状态(undersized+degraded+peered)

```

#停止该PG副本osd.5

$ systemctl stop ceph-osd@5

#查看该PG状态undersized+degraded+peered

$ ceph pg dump | grep ^3.7f

dumped all

3.7f 70 0 140 0 0 608174080 1623 1623 stale+undersized+degraded+peered 2018-07-05 15:35:51.629636 21365'80169 21367:132165 [5] 5 [5] 5 21315'80115 2018-07-05 02:52:51.512568 6206'80083 2018-06-29 22:51:05.831219

```

* g. 拉起PG 3.7f中副本osd.21(此时的osd.21数据比较陈旧), 查看PG状态(down)

```

#拉起该PG的osd.21

$ systemctl start ceph-osd@21

#查看该PG的状态down

$ ceph pg dump | grep ^3.7f

dumped all

3.7f 66 0 0 0 0 591396864 1548 1548 down 2018-07-05 15:36:38.365500 21361'80161 21370:111729 [21] 21 [21] 21 21315'80115 2018-07-05 02:52:51.512568 6206'80083 2018-06-29 22:51:05.831219

```

* h. 客户端IO操作

```

#此时客户端IO都会夯住

ll /mnt/

```

* i. 故障总结：

```

首先有一个PG 3.7f有三个副本[5,21,29]，当停掉一个osd.21之后，写入数据到osd.5, osd.29。这个时候停掉osd.29, osd.5 ，最后拉起osd.21。这个时候osd.21的数据比较旧，就会出现PG为down的情况，这个时候客户端IO会夯住，只能拉起挂掉的osd才能修复问题。

典型的场景：A(主)、B、C

a. 首先kill B

b. 新写入数据到 A、C

c. kill A和C

d. 拉起B

出现PG为Down的场景是由于osd节点数据太旧，并且其他在线的osd不足以完成数据修复。

这个时候该PG不能提供客户端IO读写， IO会挂起夯住。

```

Ceph PG状态及故障模拟

https://blog.51cto.com/wendashuai/2491723

Ceph入门到精通-Ceph PG状态详细介绍（全）

Placement Group States（PG状态）

creating