只有dba_objects 试图显示 回收站中的对象

Summary

After creating a custom Oracle10g database with the Ultrasearch component configured, you check DBA_OBJECTS to see whether any objects are invalid and you find that one or more triggers (owned by the WK_TEST schema) are listed as invalid. For example:

SQL> select owner, object_name, object_type from dba_objects where status='INVALID';

OWNER OBJECT_NAME OBJECT_TYPE

WK_TEST BINI9rjO2Nrz43gQJQKQSwgzw==0 TRIGGER

When you check DBA_TRIGGERS, no triggers are listed as invalid.

When you check DBA_RECYCLEBIN, you find the original name of the trigger (before it was moved to the recyclebin). For example:

SQL> select owner,object_name,original_name, type from dba_recyclebin where

object_name='BINI9rjO2Nrz43gQJQKQSwgzw==0'

OWNER OBJECT_NAME ORIGINAL_NAME TYPE

WK_TEST BINI9rjO2Nrz43gQJQKQSwgzw==0 WK$UPD_TRIG TRIGGER

and when you check DBA_OBJECTS, you find that the original trigger is valid. For example:

SQL> select owner, object_name, object_type, status from dba_objects where object_name='WK$UPD_TRIG';

OWNER OBJECT_NAME OBJECT_TYPE STATUS

WK_TEST WK$UPD_TRIG TRIGGER VALID

In summary, the DBA_OBJECTS view lists an invalid trigger but further investigation shows that the trigger is in the recyclebin and is no longer required (as it has been re-created).

This problem may affect Oracle10g databases that do not have the Ultrasearch component configured, but the schema that owns the trigger(s) will be different.

Solution

To purge an invalid trigger from the recyclebin, and stop it from being referenced in DBA_OBJECTS, do the following:

  1. Identify the table that the trigger is based on (and any other indexes/triggers that are based on the same table). For example:

SQL> select owner, object_name, original_name, type from dba_recyclebin where base_object = (select base_object from dba_recyclebin where object_name='BINI9rjO2Nrz43gQJQKQSwgzw==0');

OWNER OBJECT_NAME ORIGINAL_NAME TYPE

WK_TEST BINI9rjO2Nnz43gQJQKQSwgzw==0 WK$URL_DSID_STATUS_IDX INDEX

WK_TEST BINI9rjO2Noz43gQJQKQSwgzw==0 WK$URL_DSID_ENQ_IDX INDEX

WK_TEST BINI9rjO2Npz43gQJQKQSwgzw==0 WK$URL_ACCESS_URL_IDX INDEX

WK_TEST BINI9rjO2Nqz43gQJQKQSwgzw==0 WK$URL_PK INDEX

WK_TEST BINI9rjO2Nrz43gQJQKQSwgzw==0 WKUPD_TRIG TRIGGER **WK_TEST BINI9rjO2Nsz43gQJQKQSwgzw==0 WKURL TABLE**

  1. Purge the table from the recyclebin. For example:

SQL> purge table WK_TEST."BINI9rjO2Nsz43gQJQKQSwgzw==0";

  1. Verify that the invalid trigger is no longer referenced in DBA_OBJECTS

  2. Repeat steps 1-3 for any other invalid triggers in the recyclebin

@ Added for WebIV searches:

Attachments :

Cause

The table that the trigger is based on was dropped and re-created, but the dropped table (and any associated triggers or indexes) were not purged from the recyclebin.

In Oracle10g, Development have made a small change to some of the data dictionary views.

This change means that most views will display objects that are currently in the recyclebin but some views will not display objects that are currently in the recyclebin.

The views that will not display objects that are currently in the recyclebin are:

  • the *_TABLES family of views (DBA_TABLES, USER_TABLES, ALL_TABLES)
  • the *_INDEXES family of views (DBA_INDEXES, USER_INDEXES, ALL_INDEXES)
  • the *_TRIGGERS family of views (DBA_TRIGGERS, USER_TRIGGERS, ALL_TRIGGERS)

Other views (like the *_OBJECTS family of views) will display objects that are currently in the recyclebin

相关推荐
ClouGence14 小时前
Oracle 数据同步为什么会出现数据不一致?长事务是常被忽略的原因
数据库·后端·oracle
ClouGence7 天前
Oracle CDC 架构优化:从主库直连到 DataGuard 备库同步
数据库·后端·oracle
曹牧7 天前
Oracle EXPLAIN PLAN
数据库·oracle
贤时间7 天前
codex 助力oracle ebs 开发
数据库·oracle
秉承初心7 天前
PostgreSQL 数据性能瓶颈突破实战
数据库·postgresql·oracle
Curvatureflight8 天前
MySQL 深分页越来越慢?从 LIMIT OFFSET 改成游标分页
数据库·oracle
XZ-0700018 天前
MySQL事务
数据库·mysql·oracle
tiancaijiben8 天前
阿里云函数计算FC如何实现网站的定时任务与自动化
数据库·oracle·dba
xfhuangfu8 天前
Oracle 19c 多租户体系架构介绍
数据库·oracle·架构
杨云龙UP8 天前
Spotlight 接入 Oracle 数据库监控操作指南 2026-06-16
数据库·oracle·性能监控·预警·阈值·spotlight·瓶颈分析