大模型数学库DeepSeek-Math-V2

大型语言模型在数学推理方面取得显著进展,但仅依赖正确答案奖励存在根本性局限:正确结果未必代表严谨推导。为此,研究团队提出"可自我验证的数学推理"框架,通过训练验证器评估证明过程的严谨性,并以此作为生成器的奖励模型。该框架采用验证计算扩展策略,自动标注难验证证明以持续提升验证能力。最终模型DeepSeekMath-V2在IMO、CMO等顶级数学竞赛中取得突破性成绩(如Putnam 118/120分),证明该方向对开发更强大的数学AI系统具有可行性。相关模型已在HuggingFace平台开源。

Large language models have made significant progress in mathematical reasoning, which serves as an important testbed for AI and could impact scientific research if further advanced. By scaling reasoning with reinforcement learning that rewards correct final answers, LLMs have improved from poor performance to saturating quantitative reasoning competitions like AIME and HMMT in one year. However, this approach faces fundamental limitations. Pursuing higher final answer accuracy doesn't address a key issue: correct answers don't guarantee correct reasoning. Moreover, many mathematical tasks like theorem proving require rigorous step-by-step derivation rather than numerical answers, making final answer rewards inapplicable. To push the limits of deep reasoning, we believe it is necessary to verify the comprehensiveness and rigor of mathematical reasoning. Self-verification is particularly important for scaling test-time compute, especially for open problems without known solutions. Towards self-verifiable mathematical reasoning, we investigate how to train an accurate and faithful LLM-based verifier for theorem proving. We then train a proof generator using the verifier as the reward model, and incentivize the generator to identify and resolve as many issues as possible in their own proofs before finalizing them. To maintain the generation-verification gap as the generator becomes stronger, we propose to scale verification compute to automatically label new hard-to-verify proofs, creating training data to further improve the verifier. Our resulting model, DeepSeekMath-V2, demonstrates strong theorem-proving capabilities, achieving gold-level scores on IMO 2025 and CMO 2024 and a near-perfect 118/120 on Putnam 2024 with scaled test-time compute. While much work remains, these results suggest that self-verifiable mathematical reasoning is a feasible research direction that may help develop more capable mathematical AI systems.

https://huggingface.co/deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Math-V2

参考

https://ollama.com/t1c/deepseek-math-7b-rl
https://huggingface.co/deepseek-ai/deepseek-math-7b-base/tree/main

相关推荐
水獭比特9 分钟前
工具都批准了,为什么还不能执行?给 Agent 补上第二道校验
javascript·人工智能·node.js
小小帅呀16 分钟前
学习 VLA 第 2 天:深度学习基础
人工智能·深度学习·学习
科技小E29 分钟前
国标GB28181视频平台EasyGBS监控为什么会“瞎”:视频质量诊断EasyVQD如何揪出黑屏卡顿偏色
大数据·人工智能·音视频
仙女修炼史32 分钟前
ultralytics-yolov8的数据增强
人工智能·opencv·yolo
2601_9670972233 分钟前
接待机器人推荐:2026年主流品牌多场景选型指南
人工智能
audyxiao00144 分钟前
热点快讯│2026年世界机器人大会精彩看点
人工智能·机器人·具身智能·世界机器人大会·wrc2026
南吕十七1 小时前
RAG与Agent_体系
人工智能·机器学习
飞凌嵌入式1 小时前
工业控制+AI视觉齐发,飞凌嵌入式将亮相国际物联网展·深圳站
人工智能·物联网
AI工具测评家1 小时前
硕博论文怎么降低AI检测率?从深层语义改写到专业术语保留全面解析
人工智能·降重·ai检测·查重·降ai