大模型数学库DeepSeek-Math-V2

大型语言模型在数学推理方面取得显著进展,但仅依赖正确答案奖励存在根本性局限:正确结果未必代表严谨推导。为此,研究团队提出"可自我验证的数学推理"框架,通过训练验证器评估证明过程的严谨性,并以此作为生成器的奖励模型。该框架采用验证计算扩展策略,自动标注难验证证明以持续提升验证能力。最终模型DeepSeekMath-V2在IMO、CMO等顶级数学竞赛中取得突破性成绩(如Putnam 118/120分),证明该方向对开发更强大的数学AI系统具有可行性。相关模型已在HuggingFace平台开源。

Large language models have made significant progress in mathematical reasoning, which serves as an important testbed for AI and could impact scientific research if further advanced. By scaling reasoning with reinforcement learning that rewards correct final answers, LLMs have improved from poor performance to saturating quantitative reasoning competitions like AIME and HMMT in one year. However, this approach faces fundamental limitations. Pursuing higher final answer accuracy doesn't address a key issue: correct answers don't guarantee correct reasoning. Moreover, many mathematical tasks like theorem proving require rigorous step-by-step derivation rather than numerical answers, making final answer rewards inapplicable. To push the limits of deep reasoning, we believe it is necessary to verify the comprehensiveness and rigor of mathematical reasoning. Self-verification is particularly important for scaling test-time compute, especially for open problems without known solutions. Towards self-verifiable mathematical reasoning, we investigate how to train an accurate and faithful LLM-based verifier for theorem proving. We then train a proof generator using the verifier as the reward model, and incentivize the generator to identify and resolve as many issues as possible in their own proofs before finalizing them. To maintain the generation-verification gap as the generator becomes stronger, we propose to scale verification compute to automatically label new hard-to-verify proofs, creating training data to further improve the verifier. Our resulting model, DeepSeekMath-V2, demonstrates strong theorem-proving capabilities, achieving gold-level scores on IMO 2025 and CMO 2024 and a near-perfect 118/120 on Putnam 2024 with scaled test-time compute. While much work remains, these results suggest that self-verifiable mathematical reasoning is a feasible research direction that may help develop more capable mathematical AI systems.

https://huggingface.co/deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Math-V2

参考

https://ollama.com/t1c/deepseek-math-7b-rl
https://huggingface.co/deepseek-ai/deepseek-math-7b-base/tree/main

相关推荐
thesky1234564 小时前
27届大模型岗面试准备(三):位置编码全景——从绝对编码到 RoPE/ALiBi 的演进与手推
人工智能·ai·大模型
动恰客流统计4 小时前
ReID边缘计算视觉统计:餐饮店客流增长的数字化破局路径
java·大数据·运维·人工智能
小小仙子5 小时前
矢量网络分析仪如何测试S参数的?
人工智能·算法·机器学习
IT_陈寒5 小时前
SpringBoot这个分页坑,我踩了三天才爬出来
前端·人工智能·后端
颜酱5 小时前
05 | 召回前置准备:根据业务数据库生成各数据库(读取配置阶段)
前端·人工智能·后端
Infedium5 小时前
英特物理AI仿真赋能制造!打破传统有限元瓶颈,研发提效降本翻倍
人工智能·制造
天国梦6 小时前
2026英语教学系统选型实战:AI如何让备课效率提升42%?天学网技术落地全解析
人工智能·学习
hqyjzsb6 小时前
AI证书和传统证书有什么区别?
人工智能·金融·数据挖掘·数据分析·aigc·创业创新·学习方法
阿里云大数据AI技术6 小时前
阿里云 Elasticsearch 9.4 Agent Builder 实战
人工智能·elasticsearch·agent
用户7783366132116 小时前
serpbase + Cloudflare R2 边缘持久化实战
前端·人工智能