大模型数学库DeepSeek-Math-V2

大型语言模型在数学推理方面取得显著进展,但仅依赖正确答案奖励存在根本性局限:正确结果未必代表严谨推导。为此,研究团队提出"可自我验证的数学推理"框架,通过训练验证器评估证明过程的严谨性,并以此作为生成器的奖励模型。该框架采用验证计算扩展策略,自动标注难验证证明以持续提升验证能力。最终模型DeepSeekMath-V2在IMO、CMO等顶级数学竞赛中取得突破性成绩(如Putnam 118/120分),证明该方向对开发更强大的数学AI系统具有可行性。相关模型已在HuggingFace平台开源。

Large language models have made significant progress in mathematical reasoning, which serves as an important testbed for AI and could impact scientific research if further advanced. By scaling reasoning with reinforcement learning that rewards correct final answers, LLMs have improved from poor performance to saturating quantitative reasoning competitions like AIME and HMMT in one year. However, this approach faces fundamental limitations. Pursuing higher final answer accuracy doesn't address a key issue: correct answers don't guarantee correct reasoning. Moreover, many mathematical tasks like theorem proving require rigorous step-by-step derivation rather than numerical answers, making final answer rewards inapplicable. To push the limits of deep reasoning, we believe it is necessary to verify the comprehensiveness and rigor of mathematical reasoning. Self-verification is particularly important for scaling test-time compute, especially for open problems without known solutions. Towards self-verifiable mathematical reasoning, we investigate how to train an accurate and faithful LLM-based verifier for theorem proving. We then train a proof generator using the verifier as the reward model, and incentivize the generator to identify and resolve as many issues as possible in their own proofs before finalizing them. To maintain the generation-verification gap as the generator becomes stronger, we propose to scale verification compute to automatically label new hard-to-verify proofs, creating training data to further improve the verifier. Our resulting model, DeepSeekMath-V2, demonstrates strong theorem-proving capabilities, achieving gold-level scores on IMO 2025 and CMO 2024 and a near-perfect 118/120 on Putnam 2024 with scaled test-time compute. While much work remains, these results suggest that self-verifiable mathematical reasoning is a feasible research direction that may help develop more capable mathematical AI systems.

https://huggingface.co/deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Math-V2

参考

https://ollama.com/t1c/deepseek-math-7b-rl
https://huggingface.co/deepseek-ai/deepseek-math-7b-base/tree/main

相关推荐
Raas1001 小时前
MAI Gateway(魔芋企业级AI网关)技术揭秘:AI网关支持哪些模型?从原理到落地
大数据·人工智能·网关·gateway·mai gateway·企业级产品
豪气的程序猿4 小时前
电商图片工作流怎么选?Lingko AI 对比折叠键盘主图与详情页
人工智能
小刘快学习4 小时前
把 AI 账单拆到部门:企业 AI 网关的精准分账思路
人工智能
米小虾4 小时前
你让监控模型读的思维链,可能是攻击者写好的剧本
人工智能
deepseek234 小时前
Iris 开源搜索智能体拆解:35B 与 397B 中文仅差 0.3 分,上下文管理胜过堆参数
人工智能·ai agent·开源模型
ai小陈4 小时前
CUDA Stream实战:让数据传输与GPU计算真正重叠
人工智能·深度学习·ai·pdf·云计算·gpu算力
residual_fan4 小时前
【学术论文】航空发动机故障诊断智能体:基于持续对比强化学习的动态优化方法
人工智能·算法·数据挖掘·数据分析
东风破_5 小时前
从 RAG 到 Agentic RAG:第二步,把复杂问题拆开再检索
人工智能
dehuisun5 小时前
第07篇:RAG+Agent 部署架构、资源评估与私有化方案
人工智能
米小虾5 小时前
拆给 8 个子智能体,只拿回 2.3 倍信息:多智能体分解的产出守恒律
人工智能·agent