大模型数学库DeepSeek-Math-V2

大型语言模型在数学推理方面取得显著进展,但仅依赖正确答案奖励存在根本性局限:正确结果未必代表严谨推导。为此,研究团队提出"可自我验证的数学推理"框架,通过训练验证器评估证明过程的严谨性,并以此作为生成器的奖励模型。该框架采用验证计算扩展策略,自动标注难验证证明以持续提升验证能力。最终模型DeepSeekMath-V2在IMO、CMO等顶级数学竞赛中取得突破性成绩(如Putnam 118/120分),证明该方向对开发更强大的数学AI系统具有可行性。相关模型已在HuggingFace平台开源。

Large language models have made significant progress in mathematical reasoning, which serves as an important testbed for AI and could impact scientific research if further advanced. By scaling reasoning with reinforcement learning that rewards correct final answers, LLMs have improved from poor performance to saturating quantitative reasoning competitions like AIME and HMMT in one year. However, this approach faces fundamental limitations. Pursuing higher final answer accuracy doesn't address a key issue: correct answers don't guarantee correct reasoning. Moreover, many mathematical tasks like theorem proving require rigorous step-by-step derivation rather than numerical answers, making final answer rewards inapplicable. To push the limits of deep reasoning, we believe it is necessary to verify the comprehensiveness and rigor of mathematical reasoning. Self-verification is particularly important for scaling test-time compute, especially for open problems without known solutions. Towards self-verifiable mathematical reasoning, we investigate how to train an accurate and faithful LLM-based verifier for theorem proving. We then train a proof generator using the verifier as the reward model, and incentivize the generator to identify and resolve as many issues as possible in their own proofs before finalizing them. To maintain the generation-verification gap as the generator becomes stronger, we propose to scale verification compute to automatically label new hard-to-verify proofs, creating training data to further improve the verifier. Our resulting model, DeepSeekMath-V2, demonstrates strong theorem-proving capabilities, achieving gold-level scores on IMO 2025 and CMO 2024 and a near-perfect 118/120 on Putnam 2024 with scaled test-time compute. While much work remains, these results suggest that self-verifiable mathematical reasoning is a feasible research direction that may help develop more capable mathematical AI systems.

https://huggingface.co/deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Math-V2

参考

https://ollama.com/t1c/deepseek-math-7b-rl
https://huggingface.co/deepseek-ai/deepseek-math-7b-base/tree/main

相关推荐
Highcharts.js8 分钟前
Highcharts 集成到 React 或 Vue 项目中时,如何高效地使用 TypeScript技巧?
vue.js·人工智能·react.js·typescript·前端框架·highcharts
小lo想吃棒棒糖10 分钟前
把 启元机器人Q1 的训练搬到昇腾 910B:从 MuJoCo 到 PPO 的一次完整迁移
人工智能·python·机器人·昇腾·具身智能
收放扳机10 分钟前
PCB自动化整机“末端执行器”与“机械手负载”的匹配选型
人工智能·科技·自动化·制造·pcb工艺
IT_陈寒12 分钟前
JavaScript实战技巧总结:深挖数组遍历的性能陷阱与实战解法
前端·人工智能·后端
weixin_3077791317 分钟前
RAG 级联失效分析——面试中的错误归因艺术
人工智能·python·面试·职场和发展
骑着蜗牛撵大象32718 分钟前
闲鱼捡漏自动化:关键词加价格上限先粗筛,AI 大模型再做第一轮判定
大数据·人工智能·ai·自动化·二手交易·闲鱼·关键词监控
AI创界者20 分钟前
Python 进阶实战(十八):API 网关安全与异步鉴权中间件 —— 基于 AsyncIO 的 JWT 零拷贝验权与动态黑名单过滤
人工智能·python·aigc
涛声依旧-底层原理研究所23 分钟前
可控执行系统:企业 Agent 从演示到生产的架构重构
人工智能·架构
Data-Miner26 分钟前
不本地部署,大模型怎么安全用?
大数据·人工智能·安全
zwc321043205527 分钟前
Day 5:threshold与inRange阈值分割
c++·图像处理·人工智能·opencv·算法·计算机视觉