大模型数学库DeepSeek-Math-V2

大型语言模型在数学推理方面取得显著进展,但仅依赖正确答案奖励存在根本性局限:正确结果未必代表严谨推导。为此,研究团队提出"可自我验证的数学推理"框架,通过训练验证器评估证明过程的严谨性,并以此作为生成器的奖励模型。该框架采用验证计算扩展策略,自动标注难验证证明以持续提升验证能力。最终模型DeepSeekMath-V2在IMO、CMO等顶级数学竞赛中取得突破性成绩(如Putnam 118/120分),证明该方向对开发更强大的数学AI系统具有可行性。相关模型已在HuggingFace平台开源。

Large language models have made significant progress in mathematical reasoning, which serves as an important testbed for AI and could impact scientific research if further advanced. By scaling reasoning with reinforcement learning that rewards correct final answers, LLMs have improved from poor performance to saturating quantitative reasoning competitions like AIME and HMMT in one year. However, this approach faces fundamental limitations. Pursuing higher final answer accuracy doesn't address a key issue: correct answers don't guarantee correct reasoning. Moreover, many mathematical tasks like theorem proving require rigorous step-by-step derivation rather than numerical answers, making final answer rewards inapplicable. To push the limits of deep reasoning, we believe it is necessary to verify the comprehensiveness and rigor of mathematical reasoning. Self-verification is particularly important for scaling test-time compute, especially for open problems without known solutions. Towards self-verifiable mathematical reasoning, we investigate how to train an accurate and faithful LLM-based verifier for theorem proving. We then train a proof generator using the verifier as the reward model, and incentivize the generator to identify and resolve as many issues as possible in their own proofs before finalizing them. To maintain the generation-verification gap as the generator becomes stronger, we propose to scale verification compute to automatically label new hard-to-verify proofs, creating training data to further improve the verifier. Our resulting model, DeepSeekMath-V2, demonstrates strong theorem-proving capabilities, achieving gold-level scores on IMO 2025 and CMO 2024 and a near-perfect 118/120 on Putnam 2024 with scaled test-time compute. While much work remains, these results suggest that self-verifiable mathematical reasoning is a feasible research direction that may help develop more capable mathematical AI systems.

https://huggingface.co/deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Math-V2

参考

https://ollama.com/t1c/deepseek-math-7b-rl
https://huggingface.co/deepseek-ai/deepseek-math-7b-base/tree/main

相关推荐
前端若水6 小时前
会话管理:创建、切换、删除对话历史
前端·人工智能·python·react.js
Upsy-Daisy6 小时前
AI Agent 项目学习笔记(八):Tool Calling 工具调用机制总览
人工智能·笔记·学习
企学宝7 小时前
企学宝5月专题课程丨《OpenClaw AI 智能体实战营:从零基础部署到全场景自动化落地》
人工智能·ai·企业培训
冬奇Lab7 小时前
让 AI Agent 更可靠:Harness Engineering 与多 Agent 系统工程实践
人工智能·llm·agent
放下华子我只抽RuiKe57 小时前
React 从入门到生产(四):自定义 Hook
前端·javascript·人工智能·深度学习·react.js·自然语言处理·前端框架
想你依然心痛7 小时前
HarmonyOS 6(API 23)实战:基于悬浮导航、沉浸光感与HMAF的“文思智脑“——PC端AI智能体沉浸式智能写作工作台
人工智能·ar·harmonyos·ai写作
冬奇Lab7 小时前
一天一个开源项目(第108篇):Andrej Karpathy Skills - 用一个 CLAUDE.md 文件修复 LLM 编码的四个顽疾
人工智能·开源·资讯
涛声依旧-底层原理研究所7 小时前
残差连接与层归一化通俗易懂的详解
人工智能·python·神经网络·transformer
fantasy_arch8 小时前
pytorch人脸匹配模型
人工智能·pytorch·python