AWS SAA-C03 #38

C

A company is hosting a static website on Amazon S3 and is using Amazon Route 53 for DNS. The website is experiencing increased demand from around the world. The company must decrease latency for users who access the website.

Which solution meets these requirements MOST cost-effectively?

A. Replicate the S3 bucket that contains the website to all AWS Regions. Add Route 53 geolocation routing entries.

B. Provision accelerators in AWS Global Accelerator. Associate the supplied IP addresses with the S3 bucket. Edit the Route 53 entries to point to the IP addresses of the accelerators.

C. Add an Amazon CloudFront distribution in front of the S3 bucket. Edit the Route 53 entries to point to the CloudFront distribution.

D. Enable S3 Transfer Acceleration on the bucket. Edit the Route 53 entries to point to the new endpoint.


C. Add an Amazon CloudFront distribution in front of the S3 bucket. Edit the Route 53 entries to point to the CloudFront distribution.

Explanation:

Among the options presented, option C is the most cost-effective solution for decreasing latency for users accessing the website.

Here's why:

  1. Amazon CloudFront: It's a Content Delivery Network (CDN) service that securely delivers data, videos, applications, and APIs to customers globally. By placing CloudFront in front of the S3 bucket, the content is cached in edge locations around the world, reducing the latency experienced by users.

  2. Cost-effectiveness: CloudFront is designed to be highly cost-effective, as you pay only for the data transfer and requests. It is typically more cost-effective than replicating the S3 bucket across multiple AWS regions (option A) which can incur additional costs for storage, data transfer, and management.

  3. Reduced Latency: By leveraging CloudFront's global network of edge locations, users will be served from the nearest edge location, significantly reducing latency.

  4. Route 53 Integration: You can easily integrate CloudFront with Route 53, ensuring that DNS requests are directed to the CloudFront distribution.

Option B (AWS Global Accelerator) is also a valid service for improving global access to resources, but it may be more costly compared to CloudFront. Additionally, it's typically used for applications hosted on multiple AWS resources (e.g., EC2 instances, ALBs), which might be an over-engineered solution for a static website.

Options A and D involve making multiple copies of the content, which can significantly increase storage costs and complexity, making them less cost-effective compared to CloudFront.

Therefore, option C is the best choice for decreasing latency in a cost-effective manner.

相关推荐
Johny_Zhao2 小时前
Docker + CentOS 部署 Zookeeper 集群 + Kubernetes Operator 自动化运维方案
linux·网络安全·docker·信息安全·zookeeper·kubernetes·云计算·系统运维
鸭鸭鸭进京赶烤3 小时前
大学专业科普 | 云计算、大数据
大数据·云计算
SH11HF7 小时前
小菜狗的云计算之旅,学习了解rsync+sersync实现数据实时同步(详细操作步骤)
学习·云计算
搞笑的秀儿9 小时前
信息新技术
大数据·人工智能·物联网·云计算·区块链
SelectDB10 小时前
SelectDB 在 AWS Graviton ARM 架构下相比 x86 实现 36% 性价比提升
大数据·架构·aws
泊浮目17 小时前
未来数据库硬件-网络篇
数据库·架构·云计算
运维开发王义杰1 天前
金融安全生命线:用AWS EventBridge和CloudTrail构建主动式入侵检测系统
安全·金融·aws
UI设计和前端开发从业者1 天前
UI前端大数据处理策略优化:基于云计算的数据存储与计算
前端·ui·云计算
我是小bā吖2 天前
阿里云服务网格ASM实践
网络·阿里云·云计算·服务发现
长征coder2 天前
AWS MySQL 读写分离配置指南
mysql·云计算·aws