AWS SAA-C03 #38

C

A company is hosting a static website on Amazon S3 and is using Amazon Route 53 for DNS. The website is experiencing increased demand from around the world. The company must decrease latency for users who access the website.

Which solution meets these requirements MOST cost-effectively?

A. Replicate the S3 bucket that contains the website to all AWS Regions. Add Route 53 geolocation routing entries.

B. Provision accelerators in AWS Global Accelerator. Associate the supplied IP addresses with the S3 bucket. Edit the Route 53 entries to point to the IP addresses of the accelerators.

C. Add an Amazon CloudFront distribution in front of the S3 bucket. Edit the Route 53 entries to point to the CloudFront distribution.

D. Enable S3 Transfer Acceleration on the bucket. Edit the Route 53 entries to point to the new endpoint.


C. Add an Amazon CloudFront distribution in front of the S3 bucket. Edit the Route 53 entries to point to the CloudFront distribution.

Explanation:

Among the options presented, option C is the most cost-effective solution for decreasing latency for users accessing the website.

Here's why:

  1. Amazon CloudFront: It's a Content Delivery Network (CDN) service that securely delivers data, videos, applications, and APIs to customers globally. By placing CloudFront in front of the S3 bucket, the content is cached in edge locations around the world, reducing the latency experienced by users.

  2. Cost-effectiveness: CloudFront is designed to be highly cost-effective, as you pay only for the data transfer and requests. It is typically more cost-effective than replicating the S3 bucket across multiple AWS regions (option A) which can incur additional costs for storage, data transfer, and management.

  3. Reduced Latency: By leveraging CloudFront's global network of edge locations, users will be served from the nearest edge location, significantly reducing latency.

  4. Route 53 Integration: You can easily integrate CloudFront with Route 53, ensuring that DNS requests are directed to the CloudFront distribution.

Option B (AWS Global Accelerator) is also a valid service for improving global access to resources, but it may be more costly compared to CloudFront. Additionally, it's typically used for applications hosted on multiple AWS resources (e.g., EC2 instances, ALBs), which might be an over-engineered solution for a static website.

Options A and D involve making multiple copies of the content, which can significantly increase storage costs and complexity, making them less cost-effective compared to CloudFront.

Therefore, option C is the best choice for decreasing latency in a cost-effective manner.

相关推荐
GZ8manage16 小时前
高亚科技签约奕源金属,助力打造高效智能化采购管理体系
云计算
运维成长记1 天前
阿里云错题集分享
阿里云·云计算
云资源服务商1 天前
探秘阿里云消息队列:解锁分布式系统的异步通信奥秘
阿里云·中间件·云计算
bennybi1 天前
阿里云-跨账号同步OSS Bucket
阿里云·云计算
互联网搬砖老肖1 天前
运维打铁: 阿里云 ECS 实例的高效运维与管理
运维·阿里云·云计算
xiao5kou4chang6kai41 天前
Python-GEE遥感云大数据分析与可视化(如何建立基于云计算的森林监测预警系统)
python·数据分析·云计算·森林监测·森林管理
ZStack开发者社区1 天前
首批 | 云轴科技ZStack加入施耐德电气技术本地化创新生态
人工智能·科技·云计算
爱思德学术2 天前
中国计算机学会(CCF)推荐学术会议-B(计算机体系结构/并行与分布计算/存储系统):SOCC 2025
网络协议·机器学习·云计算·边缘计算
Britz_Kevin2 天前
从零开始的云计算生活——番外2,MySQL组复制
数据库·mysql·云计算·生活·#组复制