【ChatGPT】AI评论家,适合点评论文和文章的Prompt模

原文:【ChatGPT】AI评论家,适合点评论文和文章的Prompt模板 - 知乎

总结了一个提示词模板提供给大家,适合的场景:

  1. 家长辅导孩子写作

  2. 老师给学生的作文打分

  3. 业余评论家点评文章

  4. 小编审稿(可以早下班了!哈h ) ...

使用方法:复制下述提示词到ChatGPT,然后把需要评价的文本复制到文末。

中文版提示词

复制代码
一、综合评价
主要贡献和要点 xxx(在这里简要概述该文的主要贡献和要点)
二、论文优势
1)xxx(列出该文的优势之一,例如创新实用的方法、深刻实证研究结果或理论分析,结构良好的文献回顾等)
2)xxx(列出该文的优势之二)
3)xxx(列出该文的优势之三)
三、论文不足
1)xxx(列出对该文的主要关切之一,例如对于研究结果的实现细节描述不足,对所提出方法进行评估和消融实验不充分,理论分析的正确性有待验证,缺乏与领域中广泛已知基线方法的比较等)
2)xxx(列出对该文的主要关切之二)
3)xxx(列出对该文的主要关切之三)
四、对作者的问题和建议
1)xxx(提出清晰的问题,可帮助作者在辩驳中更好地解释其提出的方法、评估结果或其他方面的内容)
2)xxx(提出清晰的问题和建议)
3)xxx(提出清晰的问题和建议)
五、综合评分(1-10) 
评分:xxx(在这里填写对该篇论文的综合评分,10为满分,6为及格线,6之下分数为不及格,可以简要陈述评分的理由)

本文的文案如下:(复制你需要评价的文章内容到这里)

英文版提示词

复制代码
Overall Review
Please briefly summarize the main points and contributions of this paper.
xxx

Paper Strength 
Please provide a list of the strengths of this paper, including but not limited to: innovative and practical methodology, insightful empirical findings or in-depth theoretical analysis, 
well-structured review of relevant literature, and any other factors that may make the paper valuable to readers. (Maximum length: 2,000 characters) 
(1) xxx
(2) xxx
(3) xxx

Paper Weakness 
Please provide a numbered list of your main concerns regarding this paper (so authors could respond to the concerns individually). 
These may include, but are not limited to: inadequate implementation details for reproducing the study, limited evaluation and ablation studies for the proposed method, 
correctness of the theoretical analysis or experimental results, lack of comparisons or discussions with widely-known baselines in the field, lack of clarity in exposition, 
or any other factors that may impede the reader's understanding or benefit from the paper. Please kindly refrain from providing a general assessment of the paper's novelty without providing detailed explanations. (Maximum length: 2,000 characters) 
(1) xxx
(2) xxx
(3) xxx

Questions To Authors And Suggestions For Rebuttal 
Please provide a numbered list of specific and clear questions that pertain to the details of the proposed method, evaluation setting, or additional results that would aid in supporting the authors' claims. 
The questions should be formulated in a manner that, after the authors have answered them during the rebuttal, it would enable a more thorough assessment of the paper's quality. (Maximum length: 2,000 characters)
*Overall score (1-10)
The paper is scored on a scale of 1-10, with 10 being the full mark, and 6 stands for borderline accept. Then give the reason for your rating.
xxx

The copy of this article is as follows: (Copy the content of the article you need to evaluate here)

编辑于 2023-07-29 02:36・IP 属地上海

相关推荐
a15046336 分钟前
人工智能——图像梯度处理、边缘检测、绘制图像轮廓、凸包特征检测
人工智能·深度学习·计算机视觉
荼蘼42 分钟前
基于 KNN 算法的手写数字识别项目实践
人工智能·算法·机器学习
数据智能老司机1 小时前
基础图谱增强检索生成(GraphRAG)——智能代理式 RAG
langchain·llm·aigc
wei_shuo1 小时前
亚马逊云科技 EC2 部署 Dify,集成 Amazon Bedrock 构建生成式 AI 应用
人工智能·amazon·amazon bedrock
ppo921 小时前
MCP简单应用:使用SpringAI + Cline + DeepSeek实现AI创建文件并写入内容
人工智能·后端
云卓SKYDROID1 小时前
无人机速度模块技术要点分析
人工智能·无人机·科普·高科技·云卓科技
vvandre1 小时前
ChatGPT桌面版深度解析
chatgpt
UQI-LIUWJ2 小时前
论文笔记:Tuning Language Models by Proxy
论文阅读·人工智能·语言模型
大魔王(已黑化)3 小时前
OpenCV —— 绘制图形
人工智能·opencv·计算机视觉
开开心心_Every3 小时前
多线程语音识别工具
javascript·人工智能·ocr·excel·语音识别·symfony