oracle 和sql server 查询数据时锁的区别

oracle:

Summary of Locking Behavior

The database maintains several different types of locks, depending on the operation that acquired the lock.

In general, the database uses two types of locks: exclusive locks and share locks. Only one exclusive lock can be obtained on a resource such as a row or a table, but many share locks can be obtained on a single resource.

Locks affect the interaction of readers and writers. A reader is a query of a resource, whereas a writer is a statement modifying a resource. The following rules summarize the locking behavior of Oracle Database for readers and writers:

  • A row is locked only when modified by a writer.

    When a statement updates one row, the transaction acquires a lock for this row only. By locking table data at the row level, the database minimizes contention for the same data. Under normal circumstances[Foot 1](#Foot 1) the database does not escalate a row lock to the block or table level.

  • A writer of a row blocks a concurrent writer of the same row.

    If one transaction is modifying a row, then a row lock prevents a different transaction from modifying the same row simultaneously.

  • A reader never blocks a writer.

    Because a reader of a row does not lock it, a writer can modify this row. The only exception is a SELECT ... FOR UPDATE statement, which is a special type of SELECT statement that does lock the row that it is reading.

  • A writer never blocks a reader.

    When a row is being changed by a writer, the database uses undo data to provide readers with a consistent view of the row.

SQL SERVER:

Shared Locks

Shared locks are acquired automatically by SQL Server when data is read. Shared locks can be

held on a table, a page, an index key, or an individual row. Many processes can hold shared

locks on the same data, but no process can acquire an exclusive lock on data that has a shared

lock on it (unless the process requesting the exclusive lock is the same process as the one

holding the shared lock). Normally, shared locks are released as soon as the data has been

read, but you can change this by using query hints or a different transaction isolation level.

相关推荐
这个DBA有点耶5 小时前
NULL不是空——数据库里最反直觉的设计,90%新人踩过的坑
数据库·mysql·代码规范
这个DBA有点耶6 小时前
AI写的SQL跑崩了生产库,这锅谁背?
数据库·人工智能·程序员
镜舟科技7 小时前
Databricks 再提 LTAP,AI 时代的数据底座为何重回大一统叙事?
数据库·架构·agent
Databend8 小时前
从湖仓升级为 Agent 时代的数据控制面,Snowflake 和 Databricks 有哪些布局
大数据·数据库·agent
ClouGence11 小时前
SQL Server CDC 能放到 Always On 备库读吗?一文讲透原理与实践
数据库·sql server
先吃饱再说1 天前
存储的进化:从 MySQL 到浏览器缓存,数据到底住在哪?
数据库
Nturmoils1 天前
字段太多看不全,ksql 的展开模式和输出控制怎么用
数据库·后端
Databend1 天前
Agent 轨迹分析与归因的数据工程实践
大数据·数据库·agent
这个DBA有点耶1 天前
SQL改写进阶:标量子查询的“隐形代价”与消除实战
数据库·mysql·架构
smallyoung1 天前
数据库乐观锁深度解析:MySQL、PostgreSQL 实战 + Spring Boot 集成指南
数据库·mysql·postgresql