SQL KEEP 窗口函数等价改写案例

一哥们出条sql题给我玩,将下面sql改成不使用keep分析函数的写法。

复制代码
select deptno,
       ename,
       sal,
       hiredate,
       min(sal) keep(dense_rank first order by hiredate) over(partition by deptno) min_sal,
       max(sal) keep(dense_rank last order by hiredate) over(partition by deptno) max_sal
  from emp;

我一开始改错了,被这哥们喷菜鸡,我草。

复制代码
-- 错误等价改写,逻辑不等价
with x as (
select e1.deptno,
       e1.ename,
       e1.sal,
       e1.hiredate,
       row_number() over (partition by DEPTNO order by HIREDATE) rn_first,
       row_number() over (partition by DEPTNO order by HIREDATE DESC) rn_last
from EMP e1)
select
    e.deptno,
    e.ename,
    e.sal,
    e.hiredate,
    x1.SAL,
    x2.SAL
from emp e
    inner join x x1 on e.DEPTNO = x1.DEPTNO and x1.rn_first = 1
    inner join x x2 on e.DEPTNO = x2.DEPTNO and x2.rn_last = 1;

我换了张表测试下,发现上面改写是逻辑有问题,如果同一个组内有相同日期的 ,分组字段内有NULL值的,确实会导致SQL结果集不一致。

复制代码
-- 将EMP表替换成EMPLOYEES,如果使用上面等价改写就错误了。
select DEPARTMENT_ID,
       FIRST_NAME,
       SALARY,
       HIRE_DATE,
       min(SALARY) keep(dense_rank first order by HIRE_DATE) over(partition by DEPARTMENT_ID) min_sal,
       max(SALARY) keep(dense_rank last order by HIRE_DATE) over(partition by DEPARTMENT_ID) max_sal
from EMPLOYEES;

最终等价改写的SQL,增加了分组字段内有NULL值的逻辑 ,和处理一个组内有相同日期的逻辑。

复制代码
select e.DEPARTMENT_ID,
       e.FIRST_NAME,
       e.SALARY,
       e.HIRE_DATE,
       (select MIN_SALARY
        from (select DEPARTMENT_ID, MIN(SALARY) MIN_SALARY
              from (select DEPARTMENT_ID,
                           SALARY,
                           HIRE_DATE,
                           dense_rank() over (PARTITION BY DEPARTMENT_ID ORDER BY HIRE_DATE) RN
                    from EMPLOYEES)
              WHERE RN = 1
              GROUP BY DEPARTMENT_ID) e1
        where case when e1.DEPARTMENT_ID is null then 99999 else e1.DEPARTMENT_ID end = case when e.DEPARTMENT_ID is null then 99999 else e.DEPARTMENT_ID end) a_min,
       (select MAX_SALARY
        from (select DEPARTMENT_ID, MAX(SALARY) MAX_SALARY
              from (select DEPARTMENT_ID,
                           SALARY,
                           HIRE_DATE,
                           dense_rank() over (PARTITION BY DEPARTMENT_ID ORDER BY HIRE_DATE DESC) RN
                    from EMPLOYEES)
              WHERE RN = 1
              GROUP BY DEPARTMENT_ID) e1
        where case when e1.DEPARTMENT_ID is null then 99999 else e1.DEPARTMENT_ID end = case when e.DEPARTMENT_ID is null then 99999 else e.DEPARTMENT_ID end ) a_max
FROM EMPLOYEES e;

差集比较后是等价的:

相关推荐
漂着的圆木5 天前
Agent 功能参与度:Copilot 怎么算
sql·数据分析·agent·githubcopilot·度量
旺仔不是程序员5 天前
LIMIT 1:PostgreSQL 只取一行的高效查询姿势
数据库·后端·sql
知识的搬运工旺仔6 天前
唯一索引与 NULL 值:PostgreSQL 主键约束与 NULLS NOT DISTINCT
数据库·后端·sql·postgresql
想念是会呼吸的鱼6 天前
【ClickHouse 常用 SQL 语句整理】
sql·clickhouse
想念是会呼吸的鱼6 天前
MySQL 常用语法整理
sql·mysql
SelectDB技术团队6 天前
StarRocks 迁移至 Apache Doris 完整指南:三步完成结构、数据与业务平滑切换
数据库·人工智能·sql·clickhouse·apache doris·selectdb·湖仓架构升级
imDwAaY6 天前
MySQL MVCC 详解:原理、版本链、Read View 与可见性判断
数据库·sql·mysql
bbq粉刷匠7 天前
触发器(下):事务与锁、binlog 一致性与替代方案
sql