TCP netstat TIME_WAIT & CLOSE_WAIT

TIME_WAIT is different from CLOSE_WAIT, and it's not necessarily a client-side fault. It happens due to how TCP handles connection termination.

Key Differences

TCP State Cause Who is responsible? Fix/Optimization
CLOSE_WAIT Server didn't close() the socket after client closed it. Server-side issue (socket left open). Ensure close(client_fd); is always called.
TIME_WAIT Server closed the socket first, waiting to ensure the client received the FIN. Normal behavior (not necessarily a problem). Use SO_LINGER or SO_REUSEADDR to mitigate excessive TIME_WAIT.

Why Does TIME_WAIT Happen?

  • When your server calls close(client_fd); , it sends a FIN to the client.
  • If the client follows the normal TCP closure process , it replies with ACK and sends its own FIN, which your server then ACKs.
  • Your server enters TIME_WAIT for 2×MSL (Maximum Segment Lifetime, usually 60s total) to ensure any delayed packets are handled before fully releasing the connection.

Is TIME_WAIT the Client's Fault?

  • If the client closes the connection first , the server goes to CLOSE_WAIT (which we fixed).
  • If the server closes first , TIME_WAIT is expected.
  • Too many TIME_WAIT sockets? It usually means many short-lived connections are being closed quickly.

How to Reduce TIME_WAIT Issues?

  1. Enable SO_REUSEADDR

    • Allows immediate reuse of the same port, even in TIME_WAIT state.
    c 复制代码
    int opt = 1;
    setsockopt(server_fd, SOL_SOCKET, SO_REUSEADDR, &opt, sizeof(opt));
  2. Use SO_LINGER to Force Immediate Closure

    • Not recommended unless necessary, as it can cause packet loss.
    c 复制代码
    struct linger sl;
    sl.l_onoff = 1;  // Enable linger
    sl.l_linger = 2; // Close socket after 2 seconds
    setsockopt(client_fd, SOL_SOCKET, SO_LINGER, &sl, sizeof(sl));
  3. Keep Connections Open Longer

    • If possible, reuse connections instead of opening/closing frequently.
  4. Tune TCP Stack (sysctl)

    • Reduce TIME_WAIT timeout if necessary:
    sh 复制代码
    sudo sysctl -p | grep net.ipv4.tcp_fin_timeout  # net.ipv4.tcp_fin_timeout = 2
    sysctl -w net.ipv4.tcp_fin_timeout=30

Conclusion

  • CLOSE_WAIT is a server-side issue (fixed by properly closing sockets).
  • TIME_WAIT is expected behavior when the server closes first.
  • Too many TIME_WAIT sockets? Use SO_REUSEADDR , linger options , or connection pooling if appropriate.
相关推荐
飏旎14 分钟前
TCP和UDP的区别是什么?
网络协议·tcp/ip·udp
呉師傅1 小时前
奔图P2500NW打印机手机无线连接方法
运维·网络·windows·智能手机·计算机外设·电脑
menge23332 小时前
OSPF知识点整理
网络·智能路由器
大力财经2 小时前
周鸿祎:AI 时代安全智能体,能否重塑数字安全格局?
网络·安全
dong__csdn2 小时前
nginx代理出https,request.getRequestURL()得到http问题解决
网络·http
DemonAvenger2 小时前
Go 语言网络故障诊断与调试技巧
网络协议·架构·go
千码君20163 小时前
计算机网络:一个 IP 地址可以同时属于 A 类、B 类或 C 类吗?
网络协议·tcp/ip·计算机网络·子网划分·子网掩码·多播地址·ip分类
华科云商xiao徐4 小时前
Kotlin动态代理池+无头浏览器协程化实战
爬虫·tcp/ip·kotlin
白帽程序员猫哥4 小时前
漏洞全讲解之中间件与框架漏洞(数字基础设施的“阿喀琉斯之踵“)
网络·安全·web安全·中间件·密码学·渗透