DC对Verilog和SystemVerilog语言的支持
- 设计语言用哪种?
- [Design Compiler对二者的支持](#Design Compiler对二者的支持)
- 简单的fsm电路测试
- 测试结果对比
- 写在最后
设计语言用哪种?
- 直接抛出结论:先有电路,后为描述。
- 设计端而言,没有语言的高低好坏,只有描述的精准与否。本文的实验结果很好的说明了这一点。
Design Compiler对二者的支持
- 我们在Design Compiler中读入命令有这样的选项,支持包括v和sv在内的三种主流硬件描述语言。
简单的fsm电路测试
- 分别给出一个简单的FSM电路的V代码和SV代码。并基于SAED32nm学习用工艺库来做DCT的实现。
代码如下
c
module fsm(
clk,
rst_n,
x,
y
);
input clk;
input rst_n;
input x;
output y;
parameter A = 3'd0,
B = 3'd1,
C = 3'd2,
D = 3'd3,
E = 3'd4;
reg [2:0] cur_state,nxt_state;
always @ (posedge clk or negedge rst_n) begin
if (!rst_n) begin
cur_state <= A;
end
else begin
cur_state <= nxt_state;
end
end
always @(*) begin
if (!rst_n) begin
nxt_state = A;
end
else begin
case (cur_state)
A : if (x)
nxt_state = C;
else
nxt_state = B;
B : if (x)
nxt_state = D;
else
nxt_state = B;
C : if (x)
nxt_state = C;
else
nxt_state = E;
D : if (x)
nxt_state = C;
else
nxt_state = E;
E : if (x)
nxt_state = D;
else
nxt_state = B;
default: nxt_state = A;
endcase
end
end
assign y = (cur_state == D) | (cur_state == E);
endmodule
cpp
module fsm(
clk,
rst_n,
x,
y
);
input logic clk;
input logic rst_n;
input logic x;
output logic y;
typedef enum logic [2:0] {A,B,C,D,E} State;
State cur_state,nxt_state;
always_ff @ (posedge clk or negedge rst_n) begin
if (!rst_n) begin
cur_state <= A;
end
else begin
cur_state <= nxt_state;
end
end
always_comb begin
if (!rst_n) begin
nxt_state = A;
end
else begin
case (cur_state)
A : if (x)
nxt_state = C;
else
nxt_state = B;
B : if (x)
nxt_state = D;
else
nxt_state = B;
C : if (x)
nxt_state = C;
else
nxt_state = E;
D : if (x)
nxt_state = C;
else
nxt_state = E;
E : if (x)
nxt_state = D;
else
nxt_state = B;
default: nxt_state = A;
endcase
end
end
assign y = (cur_state == D) | (cur_state == E);
endmodule
测试结果对比
- 我们对二者进行相同的综合环境设置并读入设计
- 分析结果如下:
sv电路图结果如图所示:
v电路图描述结果如下图所示:
写在最后
- 从上一节的结果来看,综合工具DC对两种语言的支持都是比较完美的,因此还是回归那句话,先有电路,后为描述。