Why OTA ?

Even in conventional technologies (e.g, UMTS, LTE), sometimes we performed OTA measurement especially for TRP or TIS measurement. However, in 5G/NR we are talking about OTA with almost every test, even with protocol test. Why OTA has become such a big issue in 5G/NR ? In NR, there are roughly two separated spectrum that are specified in 3GPP specification. One is FR1 (sub 6 Ghz) and the other is FR2(mmWave). In FR1, we may continue to go with the conductive testing as we do with 2G/3G/4G technology. However, in FR2 it is highly likely that we are forced to go with OTA. Why ?

We can think of several reasons for this and with a few different aspect.

  • Complexity : In FR2, it is almost sure that we will use some type of array antenna (called Massive MIMO). It means you will have a lot of antenna on the device. If you want to go with conductive testing, the connection would goes like (B) shown below, whereas you can do test as in (A) if you go with OTA. Then, it would be obvious on why we want to go with (A). NOTE : If you want to ask why we need to use an Antenna Array, Motivation of Massive MIMO page would give you some insight.
  • Not Enough Space : Let's assume that you have enough reason to go with OTA despite the complexity of cable connection, you would still face another serious issue. Even though many of the antenna element (e.g, 16, 32, 64 etc) in your antenna array, the whole size of the antenna module would not be large enough at mmWave frequencies to accommodate all the cable connectors.
  • Cost : Now let's assume that you have really, really serious reason to go with conductive (like B) despite all the complexity and space issue. Even in this situation, there is other problem with conductive test. In most of conventional test, you might have used low cost SMA connectors and cables. However, you would not get the accurate measurement with SMA type of connector / cables in mmWave. You would need K connector or even more special connectors and cables (e.g, V connectors) if the freuqency goes even higher. These types of special connectors and cables cost much higher than those SMA types. If we need to use very high frequencies (like over 60 Ghz) in the future, you may need to spend in just for connectors and cables almost as much money as a low cost equipment price.
  • Physical Nature of the Measurement : Even when you overcome all the issues described above, there is certain types of measurement that requires OTA because of the nature of the measurement itself. For example, if you want to detect the direction of the beam formed by the antenna array, you must rely on OTA measurement. You may say that you can still do this by conductive test. Theoretically, you can bring all the signals from each of antenna element path down to baseband and figure out beam direction (and other nature of the beam) by baseband processing. Of course, theoretically this is possible. But I am 100% sure that you want to avoid doing this if there is a relatively easy way like OTA test.

|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (A) |
| |
| (B) |
| |

相关推荐
赛卡6 小时前
IPOF(Input-Process-Output-Feedback)方法学简介
人工智能·机器学习·流程图·硬件工程·软件工程·系统工程
userkang20 小时前
消失的前后端,崛起的智能体
前端·人工智能·后端·ai·硬件工程
零零刷1 天前
德州仪器(TI)—TDA4VM芯片详解(1)—产品特性
人工智能·嵌入式硬件·深度学习·神经网络·自动驾驶·硬件架构·硬件工程
fdajiekong2 天前
第34课 常用快捷操作——按“空格键”旋转图元
硬件工程
czhaii2 天前
三菱PLC软元件 定时器 计数器 状态继电器 编码器
嵌入式硬件·硬件工程
真·Wild·攻城狮3 天前
【开关电源】关于GaN反激电源开关噪声
硬件工程
美好的事情总会发生3 天前
32.768kHz晶振详解:作用、特性及与其他晶振的区别
嵌入式硬件·硬件工程·智能硬件
码小文3 天前
Cadence学习笔记之---原理图设计基本操作
笔记·单片机·学习·硬件工程·pcb工艺
美好的事情总会发生4 天前
晶振不集成到芯片内部的原因分析
嵌入式硬件·硬件工程·智能硬件
嘿,二极管4 天前
硬件工程师面试常见问题(7)
硬件工程