Why OTA ?

Even in conventional technologies (e.g, UMTS, LTE), sometimes we performed OTA measurement especially for TRP or TIS measurement. However, in 5G/NR we are talking about OTA with almost every test, even with protocol test. Why OTA has become such a big issue in 5G/NR ? In NR, there are roughly two separated spectrum that are specified in 3GPP specification. One is FR1 (sub 6 Ghz) and the other is FR2(mmWave). In FR1, we may continue to go with the conductive testing as we do with 2G/3G/4G technology. However, in FR2 it is highly likely that we are forced to go with OTA. Why ?

We can think of several reasons for this and with a few different aspect.

  • Complexity : In FR2, it is almost sure that we will use some type of array antenna (called Massive MIMO). It means you will have a lot of antenna on the device. If you want to go with conductive testing, the connection would goes like (B) shown below, whereas you can do test as in (A) if you go with OTA. Then, it would be obvious on why we want to go with (A). NOTE : If you want to ask why we need to use an Antenna Array, Motivation of Massive MIMO page would give you some insight.
  • Not Enough Space : Let's assume that you have enough reason to go with OTA despite the complexity of cable connection, you would still face another serious issue. Even though many of the antenna element (e.g, 16, 32, 64 etc) in your antenna array, the whole size of the antenna module would not be large enough at mmWave frequencies to accommodate all the cable connectors.
  • Cost : Now let's assume that you have really, really serious reason to go with conductive (like B) despite all the complexity and space issue. Even in this situation, there is other problem with conductive test. In most of conventional test, you might have used low cost SMA connectors and cables. However, you would not get the accurate measurement with SMA type of connector / cables in mmWave. You would need K connector or even more special connectors and cables (e.g, V connectors) if the freuqency goes even higher. These types of special connectors and cables cost much higher than those SMA types. If we need to use very high frequencies (like over 60 Ghz) in the future, you may need to spend in just for connectors and cables almost as much money as a low cost equipment price.
  • Physical Nature of the Measurement : Even when you overcome all the issues described above, there is certain types of measurement that requires OTA because of the nature of the measurement itself. For example, if you want to detect the direction of the beam formed by the antenna array, you must rely on OTA measurement. You may say that you can still do this by conductive test. Theoretically, you can bring all the signals from each of antenna element path down to baseband and figure out beam direction (and other nature of the beam) by baseband processing. Of course, theoretically this is possible. But I am 100% sure that you want to avoid doing this if there is a relatively easy way like OTA test.

|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (A) |
| |
| (B) |
| |

相关推荐
美好的事情总会发生3 小时前
电阻(Resistor)详解
嵌入式硬件·硬件工程·智能硬件
云空11 小时前
《新凯来:半导体设备制造领域的“国家队”》
硬件工程·制造·材料工程·精益工程
小麦嵌入式1 天前
Linux驱动开发实战(九):Linux内核pinctrl_map详解与优势分析
linux·c语言·汇编·驱动开发·stm32·嵌入式硬件·硬件工程
Moonnnn.2 天前
运算放大器(三)运算放大器的典型应用
笔记·学习·硬件工程
硬件进化论3 天前
从基础到实践(二十三):MCU选型设计指南
单片机·嵌入式硬件·数码相机·电脑·硬件工程·智能手表·智能电视
Yesheldon4 天前
高速电路中的存储器应用与设计三
单片机·嵌入式硬件·fpga开发·硬件架构·硬件工程·智能硬件
陌夏微秋6 天前
开源项目-数控直流电子负载2 120w数控直流电子负载-硬件分析
stm32·单片机·嵌入式硬件·硬件架构·硬件工程·智能硬件
Hug Freedom.6 天前
CHI协议——retry
开发语言·前端·硬件工程·risc-v
Yesheldon7 天前
高度电路中时序设计之二
嵌入式硬件·fpga开发·硬件架构·硬件工程·智能硬件
lindaakk12 天前
从设计到量产:MHO5000如何实现电源EMIEMC测试全流程自动化?
人工智能·驱动开发·fpga开发·硬件工程·dsp开发·射频工程