Why OTA ?

Even in conventional technologies (e.g, UMTS, LTE), sometimes we performed OTA measurement especially for TRP or TIS measurement. However, in 5G/NR we are talking about OTA with almost every test, even with protocol test. Why OTA has become such a big issue in 5G/NR ? In NR, there are roughly two separated spectrum that are specified in 3GPP specification. One is FR1 (sub 6 Ghz) and the other is FR2(mmWave). In FR1, we may continue to go with the conductive testing as we do with 2G/3G/4G technology. However, in FR2 it is highly likely that we are forced to go with OTA. Why ?

We can think of several reasons for this and with a few different aspect.

  • Complexity : In FR2, it is almost sure that we will use some type of array antenna (called Massive MIMO). It means you will have a lot of antenna on the device. If you want to go with conductive testing, the connection would goes like (B) shown below, whereas you can do test as in (A) if you go with OTA. Then, it would be obvious on why we want to go with (A). NOTE : If you want to ask why we need to use an Antenna Array, Motivation of Massive MIMO page would give you some insight.
  • Not Enough Space : Let's assume that you have enough reason to go with OTA despite the complexity of cable connection, you would still face another serious issue. Even though many of the antenna element (e.g, 16, 32, 64 etc) in your antenna array, the whole size of the antenna module would not be large enough at mmWave frequencies to accommodate all the cable connectors.
  • Cost : Now let's assume that you have really, really serious reason to go with conductive (like B) despite all the complexity and space issue. Even in this situation, there is other problem with conductive test. In most of conventional test, you might have used low cost SMA connectors and cables. However, you would not get the accurate measurement with SMA type of connector / cables in mmWave. You would need K connector or even more special connectors and cables (e.g, V connectors) if the freuqency goes even higher. These types of special connectors and cables cost much higher than those SMA types. If we need to use very high frequencies (like over 60 Ghz) in the future, you may need to spend in just for connectors and cables almost as much money as a low cost equipment price.
  • Physical Nature of the Measurement : Even when you overcome all the issues described above, there is certain types of measurement that requires OTA because of the nature of the measurement itself. For example, if you want to detect the direction of the beam formed by the antenna array, you must rely on OTA measurement. You may say that you can still do this by conductive test. Theoretically, you can bring all the signals from each of antenna element path down to baseband and figure out beam direction (and other nature of the beam) by baseband processing. Of course, theoretically this is possible. But I am 100% sure that you want to avoid doing this if there is a relatively easy way like OTA test.

|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (A) |
| |
| (B) |
| |

相关推荐
XINVRY-FPGA4 天前
XCKU15P-2FFVA1760I AMD 赛灵思 Xilinx Kintex UltraScale+ FPGA
arm开发·嵌入式硬件·阿里云·fpga开发·云计算·硬件工程·fpga
江流月照5 天前
IP验证学习之agent编写
学习·硬件架构·硬件工程
逼子格6 天前
Altium Designer(AD)原理图更新PCB后所有器件变绿解决方案
单片机·嵌入式硬件·硬件工程·问题解决·ad·pcb·altium designer
蒋星熠7 天前
中间件架构设计与实践:构建高性能分布式系统的核心基石
开发语言·数据库·分布式·python·中间件·性能优化·硬件工程
蒋星熠8 天前
Flutter跨平台工程实践与原理透视:从渲染引擎到高质产物
开发语言·python·算法·flutter·设计模式·性能优化·硬件工程
猫头虎8 天前
2025最新超详细FreeRTOS入门教程:第八章 FreeRTOS任务通知
stm32·单片机·嵌入式硬件·物联网·硬件架构·51单片机·硬件工程
智者知已应修善业12 天前
【multisim汽车尾灯设计】2022-12-1
驱动开发·经验分享·笔记·汽车·硬件架构·硬件工程
来生硬件工程师12 天前
【硬件笔记】负载是如何烧MOS的?
笔记·嵌入式硬件·硬件架构·硬件工程·硬件设计
码界奇点12 天前
豆包新模型矩阵与PromptPilot构建企业级AI开发的体系化解决方案
人工智能·线性代数·ai·语言模型·矩阵·硬件工程
陌夏微秋14 天前
FPGA硬件设计4 ZYNQ外围-以太网-PL/PS
stm32·单片机·嵌入式硬件·fpga开发·硬件架构·硬件工程·信息与通信